Harry's anger (was Re: Draco's anger.)
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at aol.com
Fri Jan 21 07:54:33 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 122580
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "justcarol67"
<justcarol67 at y...> wrote:
Carol:
> But teaching *style* and teaching *ability* are two different
things.
> Surely there's no question that Snape knows his subject (Potions--
I'm
> not getting into Occlumency here), the first criterion for teaching
> ability. The question that has not yet been fully answered is
whether
> his students are learning what he's teaching.
Geoff:
You must also bear in mind that some folk have a deep knowledge of
their subjects but are hopeless teachers - I can think of
professional people who moved sideways into teaching in the days
before it was necessary to hold a teaching qualification who were no
good at imparting knowledge to others.
I shoudl perhaps explain for non-UK readers that, at one time a
graduate could go into teaching without having any formal teacher
training; it was very common in places like grammar schools. Many of
the teachers at the school I attended were in this category.
Fortunately, most of them managed pretty well. It was only the
occasional member of staff who dropped into the Professor Binns
category and bored the pants off everyone by basically lecturing
pupils rather than teaching them.
In the village where I now live, we have a small computer centre
where we run half day courses for absolute beginners - usually
retired older folk - and offer one-to-one help. I am now the course
tutor (sounds grand doesn't it!) and soon after I came, the guy who
was already there handed over the reins to me because he was a
retired engineer and admitted that, although he was highly trained,
he hadn't got the communication skills to put things over to
students.
I accept that Snape has the ability, but I doubt that he has the
style or the right personality to really get the learning environment
which would benefit /every/ Hogwarts student.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive