In Defense of Snape (long)

evita2fr Snarryfan at aol.com
Sat Jan 22 22:56:33 UTC 2005


No: HPFGUIDX 122725


 
>> TrekkieGrrrl wrote:
>> I was furious with Harry during all those Occlumency lessons. I 
>> don't CARE if he "understood" the reason for them. The mere fact 
>> that Dumbledore - of all people - told him they were important 
>>ought 
>> to be enough. Harry was behaving very much like a spoiled child in 
>> those classes, no doubt enhancing Snape's view of him AS a spoiled 
>> brat. 
> 
> Alla replied: 
> 
> Well, I DO care whether Harry knew the reasons for the lessons. I 
> think it would made tremendous difference for his mindset.
> I doubt anything would change Snape's view of Harry at that point, 
> but that's just me and if you think that complaining of the fact 
> that lessons made him weaker is spoiled brat's behaviour, then 
> honestly I am glad that Harry did complain, because then we realise 
> that Snape was indeed purposefully opened Harry's mind to 
Voldemort, 
> we'll at least remember that we did have hints and our suspicions 
> were not for no reason. :o)


Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Harry only complained to Hermione 
and Ron (about the lessons)?

Snape doesn't know that the lessons weakened Harry. 

Ditto with Umbridge's quill/MacGonagall, if nobody told her about the 
quill, she can't possibly know what happened.

As far as she knows, he only writes lines, with a normal quill.




Christelle, who laughted to the similarity between the pensieve scene 
and the moment in the Beauty and the Beast from Disney when Belle 
found the rose.







More information about the HPforGrownups archive