Innocent Albus? (was RE: Why should Harry...)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 23 18:11:46 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 122804
Tonks replies:
OH GIVE ME A BREAK! DD is not *in a state of panic*. DD is always
confident, and optimistic (as you have said yourself). And I don't
think that with DD around that Harry is ever in as much danger as we
all think. I think that DD watches over Harry pretty well.
> Tonks_op
> (Wand still out and pointed>>>>>)
Alla:
Yeah, that is what he says... I can go with Neri's Dumbledore
looking in the essence of the person and knowing what the person is,
but Nope, I disagree that Dumbledore is always watches and manages
to keep Harry out of harm way.
For example, Dumbledore managed quite nicely to let Harry be
abducted and be forced to go through Graveyard.
In the batle of MOM we see another "not confident" at all
Dumbledore. I mean, he may be confident when he battles with Voldie,
but he is NOT confident at all,when Harry is
possessed. He seems scared to me.
"Harry made to run out from behind his statue guard, but Dumbledore
bellowed, "Stay where you are, Harry!"
For the first time, Dumbledore sounded frightened. Harry could not
see why" - OOP, p.815, paperback.
So, I really don't see Confident Dumbledore in this scene.
On the other hand, this exchange gives me some hope against
Manipulative!Dumbledore. It sure does not look to me that Dumbledore
together with Snape cooked up a plan to "open Harry's mind further
to Voldemort", because then Dumbledore would not have been
frightened, IMO.
So, if Snape did that, I think he acted entirely on his own.
Oh, back to Albie. You are not saying that Dumbledore does not make
mistakes by any chance, do you?
Because he admitted plenty of them to Harry. I can swallow good, but
very flawed Dumbledore, I absolutely don't see Saintly! and always
in the right Dumbledore after OOP.
But that is just my opinion, of course and no I don't have my wand
with me. :o)
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive