Snape vs Quirrell
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Mon Jan 24 02:09:20 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 122849
Betsy:
> > The interesting thing to me is it seems like Snape didn't share
> > his suspicions regarding Quirrell with Dumbledore.
Magda:
> No way, Jose. Snape tells Dumbledore EVERYTHING - to the point
> where I'm sure Dumbledore wishes he'd give it a rest and shut up.
> Dumbledore's comment in GOF when he and Harry look into the
> pensieve and see Snape talking about the Dark Mark becoming
> clearer and Dumbledore saying "I could have figured that out
> myself" (not exact) proves it to me. Snape craves Dumbledore's
> approval; there's NO way he wouldn't be up those stairs sharing
> every single suspicion or thought or idea he has.
SSSusan:
Right. I believe it was Pippin (or CV?) who long ago pointed out
that, from the time of the Quidditch match, where Snape saves Harry
from falling to what might've been his death, we do NOT see Quirrell
making any further attempts on Harry's life nor making a dash for
the Stone -- until DD is away from Hogwarts. So it's possible that
Snape *did* suspect Quirrell *and* that he told DD about it.
Quirrell may have realized he was being watched and, thus, behaved
himself 'til the opportune evening when DD was oh-so-conveniently
called away from Hogwarts.
As for those who have recently wondered how Voldy couldn't know
Snape had switched sides after his little "where your loyalties lie"
comment to Quirrell, there are a couple of reasonable excuses Snape
could use.
First, remember that at this point there's no REASON for Snape to
know that Voldy was glommed onto Q's head. It could be argued by
Snape at any necessary later time that he merely thought Quirrell
was an evil man who was hoping to steal the stone for his own
purposes. Thus, Snape could claim to have been merely "reminding"
Quirrell that his loyalty should lie with Voldemort, not with
himself.
There's also the second excuse Snape could offer, which was that he
had no way of knowing that Voldy was ever coming back and that he
was merely reprimanding a Hogwarts professor for attempting to defy
the headmaster of the school.
Personally, I like the first explanation.
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive