Why should Harry be expected to listen to anyone at Hogwarts?
Dan Feeney
darkthirty at shaw.ca
Mon Jan 24 05:55:49 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 122855
Pippin:
> ...in OOP... everyone, from Dumbledore on down, very much including
Harry, ignores this advice and pursues their personal agenda instead
of the common good.
Dan:
I suppose it's possible, separating threads of the story, to divide
things into some "common agenda" (to which we have no direct
connection, or of which we have no direct evidence, which is, in
other words, "common" only by assumption, as the plethora of theories
about what's really going on continues on this forum and others)
and "personal agenda". (Note that I remove the assumed "good" from
the "common" part of the equation.) I frankly don't see the lines
dividing this way, however. Or, rather, I don't see them dividing
neatly along these lines. For example, if the Sorting Hat is some
kind of founders chorus, then the only real "common" agenda
is "working together," in a way embodied by the DA, with the notable
exception of Slytherin (and the IS in opposition).
My question, then, is, what is the "common agenda" beyond what the
sorting hat sings - what IS the context of all these characters'
actions? Does Rowling ever supply one? As far as I can tell, only for
the DE and Voldemort himself - eternal life, in his case.
Amanda:
> Snape pursues the common good: attempts to teach Harry Occlumency.
Result: Harry does begin to show a little resistance to the dreams
(trace feelings that during the dreams that indicate a "monitor mind"
separate from the desires of the dream).
> Harry pursues his own agenda: secretly wants the dreams to
continue, and so does not follow Snape's instructions or really
concentrate on Occlumency. Result: very little progress and much
frustration, and the door is opened for Voldemort's manipulations.
Dan:
In this equation, unfortunately, the message then, against everything
we ourselves feel, as readers (compromised by our desire to see the
story unfold, to see where the dream goes), and what we will soon
KNOW to be directly involved with Harry and his future, at the end of
the dream, is to ignore the content of the dream in favour of some
idealogical deconstruction of its cause. (It's nothing but a bit of
undigested Voldepotato, or the like.) It harkens back to older
discussions about the problematic position of knowledge in the
series - when, and how, is transparency useful? Is anything ever
transparent in the series? Is the parcelling of knowledge always
manipulation? Whether or not, as some have suggested, the memories
set aside by Snape were a set-up, the pedagogic point is that they
were available to be viewed so easily BECAUSE they were set aside,
because they were parcelled. Removed from context, their sense is
limited, their significance moot. The same holds true for the earlier
pensieve scene snoop, in GoF, in the Headmaster's office.
Amanda:
> Snape pursues his own agenda: cannot accommodate the violation of
his personal memories by Harry and refuses to teach him further.
Result: Harry is left open to Voldemort's manipulation.
Dan:
I don't understand enough about how Occlumency works to judge either
Snape or Harry's performance. Are we given parameters by which to
judge this? Maybe Occlumency requires a kind of self-consciousness,
an understanding of how oneself thinks or percieves things -
requiring a kind of "working together" that was simply never going to
happen with Harry and Snape. Learning the discipline, at any rate,
would certainly provide the opportunity/excuse for asking personal
questions. Harry's agenda, in this case, then, is to understand Snape
and his role, and also his own place in the "common". Somehow, this,
perhaps by way of the opacity of information I referred to above,
becomes like an attack, according to some.
If this is true, then Harry will always be percieved as headstrong
and in pursuit of his "personal agenda" - no one is telling him what
the "common agenda" is.
It makes me wonder that the problematic position of knowledge might
be either part of Rowling's cosmos itself, or part of the underlying
theme of the books.
Dan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive