Incomprehensible comparison of Sirius and Aragorn
alshainofthenorth
alshainofthenorth at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jan 24 16:13:06 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 122887
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Juli <jlnbtr at y...> wrote:
> Sure they seem completly different, almost opposites,
> all you said is right (just read up thread), but you
> forgot the goodness in both of them, the desire to
> make things right, not for themselves but for the
> world and those around him.
Alshain:
But lots of characters in books are good or have good hearts. Lots of
people want to make the world a better place in the real world, but
it doesn't prevent them from leading different lives or having
different personalities and motivations. Compare Oskar Schindler to
Mother Teresa, for example. For literary heroes it's almost a
requirement. If I wanted to compare Sirius to anyone it'd have to be
Edmond Dantès, AKA the Count of Monte Cristo, and even that
comparison doesn't fit 100 %. Monte Cristo is much colder and more
calculating, even less a part of the world.
Then again, it's generally a good sign that one can't find exact
parallels, isn't it? JKR draws up her characters to be unique, to be
what the story demands of them, uses bold strokes and vivid colours,
making all of them stand out even if in a somewhat exaggerated way.
(I was going to write, "drawn a bit larger than life", but some are
actually drawn smaller. "Cartoonish" might be a better description,
but even so, they all seem realistic.) Most of them are three-
dimensional, they have their own voices and flaws.
The only characterisation I really object to is that of the villain.
The most chilling murderer in D.L. Sayers' Peter Wimsey novels fully
goes in for the Nietzschean Ubermensch ideal, yet he's praised as a
saint by a Russian emigré, since he treats her daughter's PTSD for
free. If I'm allowed another parallel to Middle-earth, Sauron once
bowed down to the King of Númenor (with ulterior motives, but partly
from fear), and long before that, wanted to repent though his pride
got the better of him.
Voldemort/Tom Riddle, on the other hand, has no such humanising
traits (he doesn't show any in the CoS flashbacks, and Ron points out
that he commits one of the largest sins a schoolboy can commit --
that of being a tattletale and a prig) and IMO that makes him less
believable. It seems that human inconsistency went down the drain
with all other resemblances to a human being. It gives me a niggling
suspicion that JKR conveniently stripped away his humanity to make it
more OK for Harry to kill him and easier for him to come to terms
with it. And given that she's dealt with moral dilemmas before, it'd
feel like a cop-out if she suddenly shied from the largest dilemma of
all, that there are situations where your only alternative is to kill
another person and live with that decision for the rest of your
life.
Alshain (also madly in love with Aragorn as a 13-year-old)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive