Dumbledore's serious errors & what did he do to make up for it/Harry's trust
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Mon Jan 24 17:28:53 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 122895
Lupinlore:
> This raises an interesting question. WAS DD HEAD OF THE
WIZENGAMOT WHEN SIRIUS WAS SENT TO AZKABAN?
>
> If he was not, then I tend to agree that I am still disappointed in
> him. <
Pippin:
Dumbledore was not in charge of the trials, Crouch was. Sirius
is very clear that Crouch is the one who sent him to Azkaban. In
the Pensieve it is clear that Dumbledore does not have the
powers you suggest to oversee all justice in the wizarding world.
He did not have them even when he was head of the
wizengamot. Otherwise dementors would not be in use.
I am curious why you think that Dumbledore would think he
could have extracted the truth with legilimency. He had it at his
disposal while he was looking for the spy, yet he failed to
discover who it was. If the spy in the Order were not an
occlumens he would have been found out as soon as he was
questioned, just as Kreacher was.
As for veritaserum, we don't know what the side effects are.
Crouch Jr doesn't seem to be doing well during his interrogation;
his insane smile becomes wider and wider and then he drops
into a stupor. Who knows if these effects can be permanent?
Dumbledore doesn't ask that veritaserum be used on Hagrid,
even though it might establish his innocence.
I agree that wizards are often astoundingly incompetent,
however the recent discoveries with DNA evidence have shown
that Muggle justice is often astoundingly incompetent as well.
I don't understand when people say that Sirius shouldn't have
been suspected just because he was close to the Potters, when
it had been established that someone close to the Potters was
the spy.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive