Why not BRIBE the Dursleys, for heavens sake?

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 123063


Lupinlore wrote:
 
Why did he not simply BRIBE the Dursleys?  
 
Kjirstem wrote:
 
Seems to me that paying the Dursley's to treat Harry better is 
pretty close to paying them to take him into their house.  To me it 
seems likely that bribery would negate the blood protection charm 
that allowed Harry safety at the Dursley's house.  
 
Tonks now:
 
DD does not bribe the Dursley's because he is a wise man who is too 
good and too noble to do that sort of thing. Period.


Alla:
 
LOLOL! That was funny. I would think that Dumbledore would be 
forgiven by the higher powers if he would do that for the sake of 
improving Harry's home life.

Seriuously, though I think that Kjrstem is right on money. :o)
Bribery may not equal "willingly taken".

I also liked Pippin's  suggestion, but nevertheless I think 
Dumbledore can afford it indeed, no matter how much Dursleys would 
have asked.


Just my opinion,

Alla