Why should Harry save the WW? (Was: McG / DD / ...)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Thu Jan 27 14:27:03 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123183
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
> Alla:
>
> Thank you for your input, I appreciate it, but let me state it
> again - my question and argument was mainly not about
whether Harry should exercise the choice and be a Hero ( do we
all have any doubt that he will be?)
>
> My main argument was that Harry was NOT given the
possibility to exercise the conscious choice of whether to be a
Hero or not ( and frankly, I would perfectly understand him if he
would not want to. :))) while at the same time Harry is being
blamed for acting selfishly and immaturely in OOP. It had been
said that his behaviour could cost WW the war, so in that context
I was asking - why should Harry care, when they treat him that
badly AND force him to be their weapon?
>
Pippin:
I think you are leaving Voldemort's choices out of the equation
here. True prophecy, Firenze tells us, does not foretell trivial
events, therefore there is no way that Harry can be a trivial
person. Even if Harry slips away to Sidney AU and becomes a
used broomstick peddler. As prophecy is not a branch of magic
Voldemort has neglected, he must know this.
Having set his sights on immortality, Voldemort must
eliminate all who stand between him and his goal, and his
potential vanquisher is first on the list. Is that reasonable? No,
but reasonable people do not have "Evil Overlord" on their
resume.
Regardless of whether Harry chooses to be a weapon or not, he
will remain Voldemort's chosen target. Whatever Harry has been
put through, the necessity was not to make Harry a better
weapon. The necessity was to make him a harder target.
As for the theme of choice, it is true that if Harry takes what he
has been told seriously he has no choice but to fight or die. But
he does have the choice of not taking it seriously, just as Fudge
did.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive