Dumbledore & Dursleys-What DD Knew
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jan 28 03:38:26 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123272
Alla:
> Honestly, I can go with several possibilities - Dumbledore indeed
> was trying to make Minerva feel better, while not really thinking
> that Dursleys will tell him everything . The fact that Dumbledore
> says that he wants Harry to grew up "away from all that" kind of
> supports all that.
>
> Maybe Dumbledore put some kind of threat in that letter,which he
> hoped would make Dursleys tell Harry everything.
Right. So if it's the latter, then why not check BACK at some point
during the 10 years and make sure it was done? Kind of like what
Lupinlore was arguing. Or if he *did* check back, why did he decide
it didn't matter that they didn't tell Harry the story? And if DD
knew the Dursleys not filled Harry in, why was Hagrid so shocked to
learn that?
See? I'm back to the same question: DID Dumbledore check on Harry
in those 10 years or not? I *want* to believe that he did and found
that the risks there were still less than the risks of moving him to
the WW, and that he must have decided it didn't matter if Harry
didn't know the true story, but I'm not sure we know yet whether he
did do much checking on Harry....
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive