Dumbledore & Dursleys-What DD Knew
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 29 04:21:22 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123358
Alla:
snip.
Am I confusing? I am just saying that IF Dumbledore knew
FOR SURE that bribery would work to ease Harry's life, he
should have used it without hesitation.
Pippin:
And if he knows, having lived so very long, that bribery and
threats *always* make things worse eventually, and that's *why*
they're considered illegal and immoral, then he shouldn't use
them. Do you agree?
Alla:
Partially. I don't think that Dumbledore can rely on his past
experience, his past experience mislead him way too often in the
books, IMO.
ONLY IF he knows that in this particular situation with Dursleys and
Harry bribery will not work and make things worse, THEN he should
not use it, IMO.
But I don't think that he should not use bribery only because his
past experience showed him that it does not work in general, because
contrary to Dumbledore' s experience it could have worked in this
situation. It is a hypothetical only of course, but who knows, maybe
it was another of "old man's mistakes".
Just my opinion,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive