Luna's Mother's Death- Correction (Wizards and firearms )
bleckybecs
bleckybecs at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 30 17:22:00 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123459
bboyminn:
a wizard with a wand could defend himself against a muggle with a
gun, but only under certain conditions. For examples, the wizard
would have to be aware of the presents of the muggle with a gun and
aware of his intent to shoot, and would have to respond before the
muggle had a chance to shoot him.
Becky:
I agree with all that's been said. I just want to add a further
complication to wizards defending themselves against firearms. It is
quite clear that most wizards don't know what a gun is. PoA -
'Muggles have been told that Black is carrying a gun (a kind of
metal wand which Muggles use to kill each other)' and in OotP we see
Kinglsey refer to 'firelegs' which Arthur corrects him should
be 'firearms'. Seems to me that it would make it much harder for a
wizard to defend himself against the un-known. If a Muggle pointed a
gun at them, would they even know how dangerous that could be? Would
they know to defend themselves?
Becky
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive