HBP: Why I am 98.6% certain that...

[Renee Daniels]

No: HPFGUIDX 133044


> Sherry now:
> 
> This also reminds me of another thing that causes me not to 
believe in the
> good Snape theory.  In chapter two, he told Bella that it was his
> information that led to the murder of Emiline Vance.  From that 
moment, I
> stopped believing in unlikable but basically good at heart Snape.  

Calimora:

Yes, but Dumbledore also offered to Hide Draco and his mother so 
completely that Voldemort would think they were dead. Vance could 
have been similarily hidden. Expecialy since we don't know how she 
died or who all was involved in her final moments. The question of 
how completely one can hide in the wizarding world has also raised 
questions in my mind as to wether Regulus is actually dead or just 
playing really mum (which might be very improtant given the Locket 
speculation).

> I didn't buy Snape returned to the good side over his remorse over 
> the death of the Potters either.

Calimora again:

Ok, I didn't buy that either. It doesn't mean anything if you 
turncoat after your side has already lost. If he switch Before the 
Potter's were offed he might have a leg to stand on, but durring the 
victory toasts? Not so much. He might as well have just claimed 
Imperious. I personly think there's more to the story.