Danger at the Dursleys!!!
fanofminerva
drjuliehoward at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 20 20:32:26 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 133593
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Jospehine" <J.Z.Dench at u...>
wrote:
> drjuliehoward at y... wrote:
> > Now that Dumbledore is dead, the magic that protected from Harry
at
> > the Dursley's is lost. (Once Dumbledore died, "Harry realized
he
> > could move again" HBP US. page 597). LV probably would know
this.
> > Harry has an established pattern of returning to the Dursley's
at
> the end of the school year. What better place to attack him?
>
> jozoed now:
> I think there is a distinct difference between the two spells that
> Dumbledore cast. The one binding Harry at the end of HBP needed
> Dumbledore to be 'holding' the spell, and therefore holding Harry.
> Once Dumbledore died, so did his concentration on the spell. Much
> like when someone is summoning a broomstick with 'accio'. If you
lose
> concentration, the broomstick won't get to you.
>
> However, the protection spell that Dumbledore placed on the
Dursleys
> was a much deeper magic, based on blood ties and love. It was a
> permanent spell with a definite 'expiry date'- a.k.a. when Harry
> turns 17. The spell had already been cast- where as the binding
charm
> on Harry was in the process of being cast.
>
> At least that's my take on it!
> jozoed
That does make sense. So, do you see the protection spell that
Dumbledore cast as being the same type of protection that Lily
provided?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive