Danger at the Dursleys!!!

fanofminerva drjuliehoward at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 20 20:32:26 UTC 2005


No: HPFGUIDX 133593

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Jospehine" <J.Z.Dench at u...> 
wrote:
> drjuliehoward at y... wrote:
> > Now that Dumbledore is dead, the magic that protected from Harry 
at 
> > the Dursley's is lost.  (Once Dumbledore died, "Harry realized 
he 
> > could move again" HBP US. page 597).  LV probably would know 
this.  
> > Harry has an established pattern of returning to the Dursley's 
at 
> the  end of the school year.  What better place to attack him?  
> 
> jozoed now:
> I think there is a distinct difference between the two spells that 
> Dumbledore cast. The one binding Harry at the end of HBP needed 
> Dumbledore to be 'holding' the spell, and therefore holding Harry. 
> Once Dumbledore died, so did his concentration on the spell. Much 
> like when someone is summoning a broomstick with 'accio'. If you 
lose 
> concentration, the broomstick won't get to you.
> 
> However, the protection spell that Dumbledore placed on the 
Dursleys 
> was a much deeper magic, based on blood ties and love. It was a 
> permanent spell with a definite 'expiry date'- a.k.a. when Harry 
> turns 17. The spell had already been cast- where as the binding 
charm 
> on Harry was in the process of being cast.
> 
> At least that's my take on it!
> jozoed


That does make sense.  So, do you see the protection spell that 
Dumbledore cast as being the same type of protection that Lily 
provided?  






More information about the HPforGrownups archive