murder is NOT in Snape's character

[Milz]

No: HPFGUIDX 133709

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "monika_zaboklicka"
<monzaba at p...> wrote:

> 4. He went and told Voldemort of what he heard about the prophecy.. 
> and Voldie went and made the mistake of marking Harry as his equal. 
> Snape did the talking and Voldemort did the hurting on that occasion. 
> Snape must be a truly great Legitimens if Voldemort still trusts him 
> after that disaster... I just love the way he omitted the problem 
> while explaining "everything" to Bellatrix :)
> 
>

But this is why Snape is an "evildoer", imo. He's an accessory to a
crime. Without Snapes information, Voldemort would not have learned of
the prophecy and wouldn't have gone to Godric's Hollow to murder
Harry. The part Snape played in the murders of James and Lily are as
important as the part Voldemort played, which makes him no better,
morally or ethically, than Voldemort, imo. Just because he wasn't
doing the AK that night doesn't absolve him.

Milz