[HPforGrownups] theory on harry being a horcrux
Laura Lynn Walsh
lwalsh at acsalaska.net
Sun Jul 24 19:09:43 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 134603
>katssirius:
>I agree with you. This is why Harry has a scar. AK does not leave a
>mark as JKR reminds us again and again. Harry's scar is from whoever
>put a part of Voldemort inside of him. This is also supported by
>Dumbledore's description of Nagini. Harry was as closely linked in
>OOtP as the snake.
I have read a lot of the theories about Harry's scar being a
horcrux, but the thing that sort of puzzles me is that when
the AK was performed and rebounded, what Harry was
left with was a CUT, not a scar. The scar formed later as
the cut healed. A cut is a break in the skin, not something
added. I could see HARRY as being a horcrux, though I
certainly don't like the idea, but not the scar. For the scar
to be the horcrux, the part of LV's soul that is in Harry
would have to concentrate itself into the newly formed
scar - sounds odd to me.
Laura Walsh lwalsh at acsalaska.net
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive