Snape/McGonagall/Neville (was: Admonishing Snape)
demetra1225
tzakis1225 at netzero.com
Sat Jun 4 22:14:36 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 130052
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "lupinlore" <bob.oliver at c...>
wrote:
Snip:
> As I say, I think the thing thatgets in the way of my believing
McGonagall regards Snape as a friend
> is his unfairness to, indeed open disdain for, her house. I find it
> hard to believe that she would just wave that off and merrily
stroll
> arm in arm with him through the gardens on his way to abusing more
> Gryffindors. [snip]
Demetra:
But does she really see his actions as abuse of her Gryffindors?
I've pondered the question of what the other teachers think of Snape
and his methods for a while. I haven't found any evidence in the
books to indicate to me that the other teachers have issues with
Snape as a teacher. Again, look at McGonagall's comments about
Trelawney and Lockhart, her dislike of them as teachers is obvious.
Furthermore, look at all of the teacher's comments about and
treatment of Umbridge. I think that if the other teachers,
especially McGonagall, had issues with Snape we would have seen
clearer evidence by now.
As for the question of *why* the other teachers seem to be OK with
him I'm not sure, but I suspect that this may have to do with
cultural differences in what methods are OK when dealing with a
difficult and potentially dangerous subject matter. A couple of RL
analogies come to mind.
I was a nurse on a surgical unit in a University Medical Center for
a number of years. This means I witnessed many "teaching moments"
between medical students and/or residents and attending surgeons.
Sadistic is almost a mild word to describe how the surgeons
sometimes verbally assailed the residents. They would latch on to
the tiniest weakness and proceed to flail the students and
residents. Mind you, this behavior was totally accepted and
defended as necessary to training the doctor so that they could
think quickly, because in medicine you don't always have the time to
go to the library and look something up. It always seemed to me
that the attending surgeons particularly delighted in their sadistic
behavior they wore it like a badge of honor. And quite frankly no
one, including those who had been raked over the coals, ever
complained.
Of course, playing devils advocate with myself, one problem I see
with this analogy, is that these residents are young men and women
in their early 20's (barring the occasional Doogie Howser), not 11
to 17 year olds like the kids at Hogwarts.
The other analogy probably fits better with the age range. Think
about the young girls involved in competitive gymnastics. Now, this
is an area I have no special knowledge of, except for occasionally
watching during the Olympics. But, I do recall seeing a segment on
TV about some gymnastics coaches (like Bela Karolyi, etc). They are
very successful in turning out medal winning gymnasts, but the
training methods are extremely harsh. These young girls are pushed
to train past the appropriate point, IMO. Methods include feeding
them little and raging if their weight creeps above 100 lbs. The
girls often suffer from stress fractures and stunted growth. Yet
there is very little criticism of these coaches or their methods
from the gymnastics community. In fact, parents of budding
gymnastics stars pay exorbitant amounts of money to send their
children to be abused in this fashion.
So while *I* find the methods objectionable, those in the industry
apparently don't.
Perhaps there is a similar situation going on at Hogwarts. While
you and I see a problem, in the context of life at Hogwarts, the
other teachers simply don't think there is anything wrong with
Snape's methods.
Demetra
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive