Explaining the danger to Harry (was: Changing the title because I'm tired of it)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 5 03:57:34 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 130078
Amanda:
Let's remove my analogy from an immediate danger, to one that you
may feel is more applicable. I try to teach my child not to walk
into the road. <snip> You are telling me that I must make certain
that child understands and accepts why not to walk into the road;
that she must believe the USEFULNESS of this instruction outweighs
the DANGER. You're saying I need her buy-in; that I can't expect to
compel this behavior on the basis of my authority.
BUT. My child may not understand, even when explained graphically,
even if shown pictures. <snip> And so it may well be that in a given
situation, my child will believe the USEFULNESS of its ability to
walk into the road outweighs the DANGER, and will do it anyway, even
after all the warnings and explanations.
<SNIP>
Alla:
The problem I see with this analogy is that your child had not
really EXPERIENCED the usefullness of walking down the road. I am
understanding you correctly, right?
Your child may only think it is useful, but Harry indeed experienced
the usefullness of his connection with Voldie - he saved Arthur's
life.
I'd say it is a very important reason for him to keep such
connection in his mind.
And nobody explained to him why despite the fact the hesaved an
order member , he should shut it down, IMO.
JMO,
Alla.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive