Snape as father figure, was Sirius as Father Figure
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 18 07:47:16 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 130928
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Amanda Geist" <editor at t...>
wrote:
<snipped>
> Snape has been a consistent male authority figure from day one. He
> represents a critical aspect of "father": the authority, the
disciplinarian,
> the existing Power whose standards and restrictions the child
rebels
> against. He's the father who won't listen; who doesn't seem to
care; who
> sets rules and allows no excuses; whose rules seem to be arbitrary
and mean;
> who is *always there.*
I am going to agree with Sherry and Alla (good job the both of you,
btw), Snape isn't that kind of father figure for one reason. The
kind of tough uncompromising father that kids grow up to respect and
understand do what they do out of love. they want their children to
grow up strong and disciplined so they enforce that discipline until
the child is ready to enforce that discipline on themselves. I grew
up with a father like that. My dad was an ex-military prison
administrator. He ran his home like a prison ward and could smell
trouble at fifty paces. And I got off relatively easy because I
wasn't his daughter! When I was a teen I hated my father and we had
a terrible relationship. I didn't understand what he was trying to
do. I'm older and wiser now and I see more clearly. He might have
been an ass sometimes, but he was an ass that had my best interest
at heart and in the end I am better off for what my father did.
Snape doesn't have Harry's best interest at heart. He isn't being
hard on Harry for any other purpose other than being hard on the son
of his bully makes whatever passes for his heart a little lighter.
thats what seperates Snape from what you're talking about.
> Snape and Harry, in my opinion, grew closer in OoP, and not one
whit warmer.
> There is a tremendously strong bond between them, which grew
stronger
> through OoP, and which neither of them seems inclined to break. It
is a bond
> of emotion, and although the emotion is hatred, it is a bond
nonetheless.
> Neither of them will release one iota of that emotion; they remain
embedded
> in each other. The subjectivity of this bond gets very in the way
of them
> appreciating, or truly seeing, each other.
I actually agree with you here. I think there was the glimmer of a
breakthrough between the two of them that is broken by actions on
both their parts. Growing closer without growing warmer is a perfect
way to describe it.
Snape finds
> it convenient, and easy, to keep hating Harry, but I don't think
there's
> real passion there. So Snape is able to have a degree of
objectivity towards
> Harry; it allows him to teach Occlumency to him, and it allows him
some
> effectiveness as a father figure.
Nope, sorry. I don't buy Snape having anything close to objectivity
towards Harry at all. Objectivity would allow him to see Harry as
himself and not an extension of his father placed in Hogwarts for
Snapes own amusement and torment.
But something tells me we aren't ever going to quite see eye to eye
on Snape :)
phoenixgod2000
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive