Snape's abuse (Re: Would an "O" for Harry vindicate Snape?)
lupinlore
bob.oliver at cox.net
Mon Jun 27 04:56:57 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 131499
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Amanda Geist" <editor at t...>
wrote:
>
> And I think children should be exposed to someone like Snape. The
sooner
> they learn that life isn't fair; that some people are mean for no
reason;
But mean people should not be tolerated simply because they exist,
quite the opposite.
> that sometimes the mean ones are on your side even if they're not
nice;
Are they? I'm not at all sure that Snape is on Harry's side in any
meaningful way. That remains to be seen.
and
> that the nice people aren't always your friends--the better. It's
called
> reality.
So what? Murder is part of reality, as well, so is rape. I hope you
don't mean children should be exposed to murderers and rapists. No,
I don't mean that Snape is a murderer or a rapist. I just point out
that the argument is, IMO, extraordinarily weak.
Most school systems and theories seem to set out to protect
> children from reality, rather than give them a chance to learn to
deal with
> it.
>
Rather, modern school systems and theories are in place to prevent
just the kind of abuse that Snape practices -- and much worse things
as well.
Lupinlore
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive