Snape's abuse (Re: Would an "O" for Harry vindicate Snape?)
Chris
labmystc at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 27 21:13:49 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 131554
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Irene Mikhlin
<irene_mikhlin at b...> wrote:
>
> --- John Kearns <jmkearns at g...> wrote:
>
> > Probably he is, and we just haven't seen it.
>
> But we have seen it. Dumbledore has drawn a very clear
> line at physical harm to the students, and we've seen
> that it gets him very angry at OoTP.
>
> By the looks of it, Dumbledore (and Hogwarts culture
> in general) is significantly less sensitive to
> emotional abuse, however it's defined.
>
> Can anyone honestly say that any emotional "abuse"
> that Snape might have inflicted is worse (or even
> equal) than the detention in the Forbidden Forest for
> 11-year olds? McGonagall has assigned it, in case
> anyone has forgotten.
Chris: I can and will, from two different points of view, one from a
WW point of view, and one from reality. **flips a coin**...ah heads,
WW point of view first:
These kids are wizards!!!!! The forbidden forest detention would
have been scary yes, dangerous perhaps, but cause for permanent
emotional damage to any one of these kids? I don't think so. Fear is
the one emotion that we as humans seem to overcome the easiest. We
are all scared of monsters, the dark, strangers, etc. etc. when we
are small children, but eventually we outgrow these fears, and they
have no lasting emotional damage.
After the detention occurred, I'm sure Mcgonagall wrung her hands
in sorrow that she had sent them out there. But she didn't know that
Quirrelmort was lurking about in the trees, did she? The kids had
Hagrid with them, and he is quite adept at dealing with anything that
*naturally* belonged in that forest, isn't he? In hindsight, everyone
can look back at the event and say it might not have been the right
call, but WW parents are not going to yank their kids from school
over it.
Now the real world. There has been a lot of discussion on here
(some very heated from what I've read) about the teaching methods of
Snape, about how *good* or how *evil* this house is, or that person
is. If we want to talk reality where all this is concerned, let's
talk reality.
I confess ingorance as to how other schools in other parts of the
world discipline their students, and how other cultures respond to
abusive behavior, criticism, and the treatment of their children by
other adults. I do say this though. I have two daughters. If I
existed in the WW, and Snape treated my daughters the way he treats
students in this story, he would have an AVADA KEDAVRA with his name
on it!
There is no teacher in any school that my daughters are attending
going to belittle them, threaten physical harm, or in any way cause
them emotional stress. Piling on homework causes stress, and that's
fine. Good for them in fact...teaches responsibility. But to
criticize or verbally chastise a student in the presence of others is
wrong. Teachers are supposed to boost a student's confidence, give
them praise where it is due, and criticism and instruction where it
is not. I for one do not cater to the idea that if Neville's frog had
perished after being fed the potion, he would have learned a valuable
lesson and tried harder next time. This is not the way to instruct a
student to do better.
I had my share of callous, egomaniacal, holier-than-thou teachers
in school too. One of them is now a good friend of mine. They
commanded respect, self-discipline, manners, and good behavior. And
they got it! Not because we feared them, and not because they berated
us and criticized us at every opportunity. But because they deserved
it for rewarding us with the same treatment they expected.
The reason the American school system is in such a shape is
because the kids nowadays are little monsters before they ever enroll.
Disrespecting adults, bullying others for sport, and general
misbehavior...these things are the result of behaviors taught or not
taught at home. Unless the child has an emotional problem there is no
reason to behave this way. Draco is the perfect example...every
behavior he exhibits was one taught to him by his parents. Racism and
prejudice are not inborn traits, they are LEARNED!
Yes, now the teachers have rules that prevent them from laying a
hand on a student. But can you blame them?! You grab a child by the
collar of his shirt to stop him from running in the hall...next day
he brings a .45 to school and conducts target practice. This is what
the teachers have to contend with nowadays.
But how did that student get that way in the first place? In most
cases of extreme violence in schools, the kids were either outcasts
ridiculed by the other students, or they had parents that didn't give
a damn, or they were emotionally unbalanced. I like the stories about
violent music, and violent video games, and violent imagery from
movies being the root cause. But let's be real people! I played
violent video games, I listened to death metal, and I've seen the
Matrix twelve times. I however, not shot up a school. Probably
because I knew better. I never beat a smaller kid up, though I am a
third degree black belt. Because I was taught better. I never
ridiculed a fellow student, or made fun of someone because of their
appearance, because I was taught better.
This is the problem in our schools. These kids are not taught
better! The bully, the group of jocks who gives a wedgie to a nerdy
kid, the prep teen queen who makes fun of a poorer girl...these kids
were not taught anything by their parents!
I think throughout these books, Harry and the rest have shown
incredible restraint when dealing with Snape. Yes, Harry has erupted
a few times, but I would have done the same thing if I were in his
shoes. And I pray...pray...pray...that those of you who have espoused
Snape's teaching methods on here are not teachers in your respective
areas of the world. God help all those students if you are.
Chris
labmystc
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive