Percy and the Twins (was: Weasley Types (was Molly and Arthur )
Hannah
hannahmarder at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 7 15:35:41 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 125646
<snip of all the upthread discussions>
Hannah: Replying here to the whole of this thread in general.
Apologies if I repeat something someone else has said, this is just
my general view on the matter.
I'm going to sit on the fence on this one. Percy is pompous, self-
obsessed and makes himself a target for his brothers, but I agree
that their teasing affects him badly and he ends up having a hard
time of it. Likewise, the twins' 'pranks' end up upsetting people
and could potentially cause a lot of damage, but I don't see the
twins as being malicious.
The main problem is the essential difference between the twins and
Percy. Percy has no sense of humour. Ron himself puts it very
nicely; 'Percy wouldn't recognise a joke if it danced naked in front
of him wearing Dobby's tea cosy.' Thus Percy cannot accept the
twins' teasing and laugh it off. I see Percy as being very
insecure, hence his constant boasting and toadying up to his
superiors. After all, he's grown up in the shadow of Bill and
Charlie, and probably suffered from a lack of attention once the
very demanding twins came along.
Fred and George however, strike me as being thick-skinned, secure
people, who are able to laugh at themselves. Take their reaction
when they are 'pranked' in canon - the beards they grow after they
cross the age-line in GoF. They have each other, and are confident
enough to go against what their parents want, and start up a joke
shop, not to mention all their audacious pranks.
The twins do not, IMO, behave maliciously, but they can be
insesitive, especially to Percy, whom I don't think they really
understand. Percy's reluctance to admit he had a girlfriend is
evidence of the effect that their teasing has had on him. The twins
teasing isn't exceptionally cruel, it's just that Percy can't take
it. Of course, his reactions make it all the more tempting for the
twins to continue, and a vicious circle is formed.
A similar pattern is seen with Ron and his Quidditch. Ron improves
when the twins aren't around. I'm sure that the twins didn't mean
to make Ron play badly - or realise that was the effect they had -
since they care a lot about that Quidditch cup. But nevertheless,
they had that effect.
The twins' 'pranking' has been tacitly supported, and even
encouraged, by the administration at Hogwarts. Dumbledore has a
sense of humour and an obvious fondness for the twins, and no doubts
sees no harm in a few little practical jokes. The trouble is when
the 'pranks' stop being harmless. Reminds me of another bunch
of 'harmless pranksters,' apparently well loved by the staff, who
one day went a step too far and nearly killed somebody... Not to
mention that their years of 'pranking' permanently damaged and
embittered a fellow student - once again, someone without a great
sense of humour. Maybe its time that the Hogwarts staff take the
behaviour of studnets like Fred and George more seriously, and
acknowledge that it's important merry pranksters know when to draw
the line.
Hannah
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive