Umbridge, detention, scars, and plotlines, oh my!.
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 12 02:10:41 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 125933
> Betsy:
> Ah. This is where we part ways, I guess. I quite liked OotP. I
> don't recall any scenes that I thought unnecessary to the plot,
> nothing I would have cut. I liked how JKR ratched up the tension
> and introduced more depth to the storyline. I love that not all of
> Harry's enemies are minions of Voldemort. I love that friend and
> foes are not easily identified and I love that Harry's choices are
> not automatically correct. (Now if we could just work on dear
> Hermione... <g>)
I have to lean more more towards the Lupinlore side of things. I
don't think it was quite as flawed as he, but I think JK made a few
bad decisions. My opinion can pretty much be summed up like this--Too
many people acted stupidly.
The author needed the characters to get to a certain point by the end
of the book and I think she had many of them act with a level of poor
judgement that I found difficult to believe. I don't think that DD
would make the decisions to act in OOTP the way he does. I cannot
imagine a wizard of his power and wisdom thinking that way. It goes
beyond showing him to have human falability and stretches
believability. I don't believe Fudge would be quite so incompetent or
stuff his head so far into the sand. And I definitely don't think
Harry would ever really have forgetten the mirror. Aside from the
mirror though, I pretty much think he acted about as on target as he
could have with the lack of information he possessed.
Spot on with Hermione though :)
> I think we've gotten into discussions before about how the various
> characters changed - I quite liked the changes and thought they
> flowed well from previous books (i.e. Percy leaving the Weasleys,
> Molly's breakdown, Neville's bravery and determination). Ginny was
> a bit jarring. There could have been more foreshadowing in earlier
> books there, though I did like Ginny's character. And I could have
> done with more Draco (though I think his development for good or
ill
> should occur or at least start in the next book). But I liked the
> new characters JKR introduced (pause for Luna love moment), and the
> introduction of more folks not Gryffindor.
Aside from Hermione, which I think suffers from to much authorial
empathy, and Ginny, who I think was just flat out badly written, I
think most of the characterizations were about the way I would have
written them. If anything I would have written Cho to be more
devastated and off balance. Neville is a masterful representation of
a character who changes almost entirely off screen and based on only
a few scenes with Harry, but was absolutely believeable (I'm looking
at you Ginny). And the new characters were great. Before OOTP I
didn't have a dog in the Harry/Shipping wars other than my dislike of
HG and HHr but when I met Tonks and Luna I decided the ultimate Harry
ship would be some sort of Harry/Luna/Tonks threesome. Although I
would settle for just one of them ending up with Harry :)
> she's said in an interview or two that she's had the final chapter
> written for a long time now, mainly so she'd always know what she
> was aiming for. And she's so keen on puzzles and riddles, I
imagine
> she's had to plan for every mystery's outcome. So I think we're
> reading a series that has been very well planned out.
I think that could have been one of the problems of OOTP. She had
every so precisely planned out that she had to go ooc with a few of
the characters to get the to the spot they needed to be even though
it wouldn't really make since for them to do it, since she didn't
have the room to allow for changes in her narrative.
Phoenixgod2000
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive