Leaning on the Dursleys was Hogwarts Teachers -
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 18 16:22:19 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 126291
Lupinlore:
But, most of all, I think we need a LOT better discussion of
these issues on JKR's part.<
Pippin:
Nothing would justify bombarding a child with radiation and
feeding him poison till he was constantly nauseous and his hair
fell out --unless you were trying to stop a cancer from coming
back. I think we just need to be convinced that Voldemort
returned is as lethal as Dumbledore says he is.
If Trelawney's second prophecy is to come true, there shouldn't
be a problem.
Alla:
I don't need to be convinced that returned Voldemort is lethal. I
mean, stronger depiction of him as Big Evil wouldn't hurt, IMO, but I
get that what is JKR trying to do with Voldie. I'll suspend my desire
to laugh sometimes and accept that he is to be feared. :)
Personally I need to be convinced that Dumbledore was SURE that
Voldemort is coming back one day - MAYBE is not good enough for me, I
am afraid.
I also need to be convinced that Harry could not be touched by DE on
Privet Drive and I am not entirely convinced on that matter either.
I definitely need to be convinced that Dumbledore's interference with
Dursleys would have been lethal for Harry and for Harry only.
I most certainly would not have think of Dumbledore as less moral
person if he would interfere.
So, yes, I would like much better discussion of those issues.
I certainly hope that Dumbledore and Harry will have MANY talks in
HBP, not only at the end of the book.
JMO,
Alla.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive