DD's dilemma (was: Hogwarts Teachers - Lockhart)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 18 22:07:44 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 126322
Magda:
Just one teeny, weeny problem with your argument, Lupinlore: the
Dursleys weren't child abusers.
Alla:
If one defines what they did as child abuse, then yes, they are.
Magda:
We will know more in the next two books about the arrangements that
Dumbledore made with the Dursleys about keeping Harry, Harry's
protection from both Lily and Dumbledore when he was a baby as well
as other pre-series backstory. I respectfully suggest we wait until
the end of the series when we know more details before we go at this
whole issue again.
Alla:
I agree that backstory may and hopefully will give more explanation
to Dursleys and Dumbledore behaviour , but whether we have the
backstory or not, on its own Dursleys actions are horrible enough to
me. With detailed writing, Dumbledore can be 100% redeemed in my
eyes, I am not so sure about Dursleys.
Magda (who thought we had a three-a-day rule in force)
Alla, who is also pushing the limit today, but who thought that till
March 21 the three a day is voluntary.
Sorry if I am wrong.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive