[HPforGrownups] Is Flamel dead yet?
rayheuer3 at aol.com
rayheuer3 at aol.com
Fri Mar 25 20:59:47 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 126578
Steve/bboyminn wrote:
>Others will react differently, but if handled well, I won't have a
>problem with Flamel appearing in the remaining books, perhaps I am
>bias because, since he was first mentioned, that's exactly what I've
>wanted to happen.
I missed the original post(s) in this thread, and I'm too lazy to look it
up, so forgive me if I'm just repeating earlier statements.
Ever since it was made clear that Fudge would soon be the ex-MoM, my wife
and I have had a continuing argument about this. I insist that Nicholas Flamel
would seem the obvious choice for the new Minister of Magic. He has the
twin advantages of name recognition and being closely associated with Dumbledore
while not being Dumbledore (who certain factions in the Ministry would
certainly oppose). My wife, on the other hand, insists that Flamel died shortly
after Book 1. There is absolutely no canon on whether he is alive or dead,
and if JKR is thinking along the same lines as I am, there is no reason why
Flamel could not still be alive.
[Wifey has not been interested in discussing the matter since JKR announced
that the new MoM would not be Arthur Weasley.] ::snicker::
-- Ray
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive