Why Veritaserum was ot used at Sirius' trial? WasRe: JKR's website
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Fri May 13 14:23:10 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 128854
Nora wrote:
Of much interest is an answer to the "Why didn't the Ministry use
Veritaserum?" question, at
http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/faq_view.cfm?id=105
<SNIP of JKR answer which can be read by pressing UPTHREAD button>
Veritaserum can be resisted. It is not considered infallible, but
can be argued against in such a way that the testimony from it can
always be quibbled with. Crouch was never going to let Sirius have
that chance, either. One can use Occlumency against Veritaserum--
oooh, nifty. Discuss!
Alla:
To tell you the truth, now I am wondering even more whether non-use
of Veritaserum was a plot hole. She basically said nothing that
fanfiction writers did not predict. Yes, the only way to get out of
non-use of the Veritaserum is to say that it is not 100% correct,
that it can be resisted, etc. etc. etc.
The question is whether she planned it that way from the beginning or
she had to come with the answer now,when many fans undoubtedly asked
her that.
The only new thing is that you can use Occlumency against
Veritaserum, but it is also part of resistance, right?
Just my opinion,
Alla.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive