Predictions & PS on Sirius

Sun May 15 12:43:50 UTC 2005

No: HPFGUIDX 128954

I must congratulate Tigerpatronus on her prediction challenge. The participation has been great and it's a lot of fun for everyone.

Catkind asked me why I didn't participate in this if I could see the pattern of Harry Potter so clearly. The point is that the basic pattern of the story is like the foundation of a house. This is normally not visible but is extremely important and determines everything else about the house. Harry Potter is an abnormally large castle with hundreds of rooms, passages, towers etc. Let's say it's Hogwarts. 

The foundation is what I'm talking about when I say I recognise Harry Potter as the process of Liberation. I genuinely and sincerely believe the foundation has been laid by the Masters of Compassion as an impulse to drive the pattern of the process of liberation into the human unconscious once again.

I've been saying repeatedly that Harry Potter is not fiction. Well, that's an exaggeration to drive home a point. The foundations are not fiction, but Jo has certainly used her imagination to build the castle. She has no choice over where the walls go, but she can decorate and colour them as she pleases and add her own furniture.

Just as an aside I want to add that Jo says very clearly she was inspired in June 1990 on that famous train journey (when, by a strange coincidence I was in England on a holiday). That's her own word: "inspired".

Knowing the foundations I can tell you where the various passages and stairs go, where various rooms, towers etc. are. However I have no way of knowing what sort of furniture is in the rooms or what colours they are, what hangs on the walls etc.

To get back to the plot of Harry Potter, I can see the main outlines of the events as they will happen in book 7. However I can't tell you the exact order they will happen. I can see the process of liberation, but Jo is not presenting it in the order it happens. She is really telling the story over and over again in different ways. The moment when Harry gives the sock to Dobby via Lucius symbolises the moment when the etheric body is detached from the physical body. This means total liberation from death and illness. However that's in Part 2, and all this will be repeated in book 7, I'm sure, but on a grand scale with all the characters participating. 

Similarly the five initiations are not in the actual order. Liberation is actually followed immediately by the birth of the Mercury consciousness (Hermione). Then comes Venus (Love), after which comes Mars (defeating Voldemort with will-power), and then Jupiter (Dumbledore's Army) followed by Saturn. If we were to put things in the right order a lot of the things would happen after book 7. 

It's the same with Neville Longbottom (See my post on Neville). In real life the seeker is born first, then the soul many years later. But in Harry Potter it's the other way around, seen in chronological order. First Harry and Neville are born one day apart, and then eleven years later Neville causes Harry to be made Seeker. It doesn't matter in the least. Jo is getting the point across. She is telling us the story of liberation by jumping back and forth. It's as if she's like the Buddha who used to have discussions with his pupils about the Path. Some one would ask him a question and he would discuss that. One day it would be about the end, another day about the beginning of the Path. The point I'm trying to make is that although you may know the whole Path in and out, and backwards and forwards, you're still not going to know what the Buddha is going to talk about tomorrow, do you?

The one thing that is in the right order in Harry Potter is the ascent through the floors of the Tower of Olympus as told in The Alchemical Wedding. Part 6 will definitely show Harry's emotional ego being liberated, and all things point to this being connected to the Room of Love, because both those things are in the heart. So is Percy, and I therefore suspect, though I can't be sure, that he will be involved. Lily could also be involved. That's about all I can say about book 6.

I do like Tiger's competition, and I think it's a lot of fun, but how can I possibly guess who will be the next minister of Magic? Or how many owls Harry will get? No one knows that except Jo, as they're decorations on the walls of Hogwarts and not part of the layout of the foundations.

I hope Catkind understands my point of view. Anyway I do like predicting, so I'm going to make a list of the characters and what I think will happen to them.

Voldemort: bad future. Will finally vanish like a puff of smoke in book 7. Jo likes to over dramatise things, so it may be quite a mind-blowing event, but ultimately that's what happens to the old microcosmic self when the soul is liberated. I guess it'll be something like Quirrell in the film. You all know how he sort of turned to dust and crumbled away.

Pettigrew: bad future. The ego just dissipates like its creator. Peter will crumble away like Voldemort. What the life debt he owes Harry means I don't really know. It probably means he will make things easier for Harry when Voldemort makes his final attack on Harry.

Harry: An extremely bright future. I guess he'll suffer a lot in book 6 and in the beginning of book 7. Jo probably makes him suffer so much to make his victory and liberation at the end all the more bright and glorious. I'm totally confident Harry will end up being serenely rapturous. He will pass through the Gate of Saturn, but won't die. Every Bodhisattva is given the choice of passing on or staying behind to serve as gatekeeper for humanity. Jo has made Harry an extremely compassionate and loving person and I'm 90% sure he'll choose to take Hagrid's job. His choice may be "forced" on him by some form of punishment, like Christian Rosycross, who was punished for seeing "Love" in the Room of Love in The Alchemical Wedding. However, his sacrifice will be compensated by the satisfaction of knowing that he's really helping humanity. Just as Christian Rosycross came "home", so will Harry, possibly by feeling Sirius' presence.

Ron: A very bright future indeed. However as the earthly personality he will have to die first, to be resurrected as part of the liberated human being. He will also be united with Hermione and Harry for ever. As the spleen chakra he will be one of Harry's team of helpers.

Hermione: An extremely wonderful future. She too will have to die and be resurrected, but her position as part of the Royal Couple is assured.

Hagrid: A glorious future. He will finally be able to leave his position as gate-keeper, and so pass on to a more elevated position as an advanced Bodhisattva. To such a person physical death means absolutely nothing. That's just throwing off an old cloak. (A moleskin cloak?)

Valky: a wonderful future. Will pass her exams and watch her partner play his best footy match ever.

Draco: poor lad. He will be replaced by Harry. I don't know exactly how Jo will symbolise that, but Draco will either die or bow to Harry to serve him. In reality the old serpent-fire just disappears and the new one enters the spinal cord in a mini-second, but Jo likes to dramatise things a bit.

Crabbe and Goyle: Will have to help Harry defeat Draco. In Part 2 this was symbolised as Harry and Ron giving them sleeping draught and taking on their bodies. How Part 7 will do this I can't be sure.

Neville Longbottom (medulla oblongata): A wonderful task lies ahead for him as the gatekeeper to the heart-sanctuary. It is he who will have the privilege of opening the gate of the heart to the Holy Spirit who will perform the Alchemical Wedding, and the resurrection, of the Trio.

The Weasleys: all have an extremely bright and wonderful future. They will all help Harry achieve liberation.

Percy especially will see his ambitions go up in smoke and will realise his folly. In the end he will help Harry. As the heart chakra he will possibly be connected somehow to the Holy Grail and to a magic shield.

Charlie will possibly be connected to a magic word or sword.

Bill as the pineal chakra will be Harry's Crown.

Lucius: as the physical brain he will survive, but as the I-consciousness he will be replaced by the Mercury consciousness. How Jo will symbolise that I don't know. Narcissa will also end up serving Harry.

Snape & Lupin: not a bright future, but they will be happy to sacrifice themselves for the trio's alchemical wedding. Their death will be final though.

Sirius: Will stay in "heaven" but will help Harry. As the personification of the Divine Plan for the reborn human being he will continue as guide, mentor and God-Father.

Dumbledore: Will conduct the Alchemical Wedding at the end.

McGonagall: Will continue to help Dumbledore and assist in the Alchemical Wedding.

Argus Filch: As the personification of the "eyes" of the person going the Path, he will have the experience of the travellers to Emmaus (Luke 24:13-31), whose eyes were opened when they saw Jesus break the bread. Argus will finally "see" Harry or the resurrected trio  for what he/it is, and for the first time in his life become magical. (Perhaps this is also like Paul on the road to Damascus.)

Dobby: A brilliant future. I see him as the liberated etheric body of the alchemist. He will therefore be of great assistance to Harry at the end and will possibly do extremely wonderful and brave deeds. He will possibly be dressed in gold clothes, or some extremely valuable costume, symbolising the radiant "golden wedding vesture" of the candidate for the Alchemical Wedding.

Luna Lovegood: If she symbolises "faith" she will be accompanied in book 6 by "hope" (the lion bloke?), and by "Love" in book 7. Be careful though! The lion bloke could also be "the lion-faced power", i.e. false love, which puts on a sweet face but is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Grawp: As the personification of that part of humanity susceptible to the teachings of liberation he will possibly become a little more civilised, possibly going to "school".

In view of Tiger's success in inviting people to make predictions, may I do the same? 

Hans

PS 
I'd just like to refer back to something Geoff said ages ago (well, months actually). I have repeatedly stated that Sirius' friends' names are significant. I'm referring to JAMES Potter, PETER Pettigrew and Remus JOHN Lupin. I've pointed out that the TRANSFIGURATION (know that word?) of Jesus on the mount was watched by James, Peter and John. Geoff said that those three are the most common names in England, and that it was all coincidence. 

I'd like to take this up again. Yes, I agree they probably are the most common names. It just so happens that I was a teacher in the years Sirius and his friends went to school. Certainly in every class there were boys with those names, but I remember just as many Scotts, Terrys, Patricks, Geoffs, Robins, Christophers, Gregs, Michaels, Adams, Ians etc. Let's do some statistics and probability. In a class of 40 boys, let's really exaggerate  and say the 10% of boys at the time of the Marauders were called Peter, 10% John and 10% James (or Jim). That would actually be a very rare occurrence, because in my experience there would never have been 4 Peters, 4 Johns and 4 James's in a class of 40 boys ( I myself was in a class of 54 boys for a number of years); 2 of each at the most. But to prove my point let's take 10% each. In mathematical terms, the probability of one person having three friends with those three names would be One in 10 x 10 x 10 = 1000. That's the maximum! It's more
 likely to be 20 x 20 x 20 = 6000. 

So to say that it's a coincidence that Sirius' friends happened to be the same as Jesus' 3 top disciples is possible, but the chances are one in thousands. In fact I think it's underestimating Jo's intelligence to say a thing like that. Everything she does is so obviously deliberate, so calculated (in the kindest meaning of the word) and so intelligently put together, that I think this whole thing is no coincidence at all, but deliberate. Jo is nailing her flag to the mast.

This is the same sort of thing as saying "Christian Rosycross" doesn't prove the Alchemical Wedding of Christian Rosycross is Christian, which I discussed in my last post. 

I think the problem is that Sirius doesn't look and act like a Christ figure, and so we dismiss the evidence. It's the same with Hagrid. I've repeatedly said Hagrid is a Bodhisattva, a divine messenger (who brings fire to the giants, just like Prometheus), but people won't accept this because he's big and oafish and gets drunk. Well I think Jo is doing this on purpose. I think she's deliberately attacking our prejudices about what a divine messenger, be it Sirius or Hagrid, acts and looks like.

I sincerely hope there are some people who have open minds about what Jo is really saying to humanity.

PPS
Dear Catlady (Rita Price-Winston), I did not predict Harry would be wounded in the hand in Part 5. That must have been someone else. But thanks for your support. I WAS right about the other things, though (Dumbledore's Army, the arch with the veil, the Room of Love, and driving Voldemort from Harry's mind).

PPPs
Catlady, Catkind, Tigerpatronus - what is this! Help, I'm surrounded by felines. 

"If I talk too freely about whether I believe in God I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to guess what's coming in the books." JK Rowling
-------------------------------------------
See you at http://www.harrypotterforseekers.com
Hans Andréa

---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Messenger  - want a free & easy way to contact your friends online?  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]