Snape has a SON??? Theory Lists
unicorn_72
Unicorn_72 at yahoo.com
Mon May 16 03:14:55 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 128989
<snipped and edit for easy reply>
Adding a new theory I just though of here first:
Also another idea I have just had is, based somewhat on the theory
of Snape being loyal to dumbledore, and somewhat on Snape having a
son that was killed, What if Snape, did something to try and Save
Neville/Harry/ or Both or the Potters or something for the order
that involved one of them (harry/neville), I don't have any idea
what, this is just an idea, but what if in doing so he got his own
child/family killed because of those actions. Could that not be a
very good reason why he might dislike/hate Harry and/or Neville so
much, because he sees them as the reason his child/family is dead.
Or, when he looks at them he might find it hard because his own
child would be their age...etc etc.
Ok on with my reply.
> >
> > 1. He has a son, or..(haha) twins, we just dont' see the
> > family..basicly.
> Julie reply: Definitely possible. The question then would be "Why
don't
> we see or hear about his family?"
KarentheUnicorn's Reply:
Maybe the reason is the child is in hiding, I guess this one could
fall under #4, so, my theories are multitasking.
>
> > 2. JKR is keeping us guessing and says daughter just so we will
> > continue to think Snape has a son.
> Julie Reply: Possible. Or she could have just used "daughter" to
be literal,
> without intending to set up speculation. She does mislead to hide
> plot developments, but I'm not sure she misleads to deliberately
> send fans down merry paths that lead to nowhere.
KarentheUnicorn's Reply: I agree, but I'm sure she knows by saying
daughter, we are going to start going..hummmm...cause when I first
read it, I though, daughter? why didn't she say kids or children.
Actually I had never heard the Luna being Snapes child theory, I
only went to the website actually because on the Lexicon it listed
Sprout as having a birthday, and I clicked on the link..and stared
to explore. So Sprout's first name is...isan't that a city? <laughs>
> > 4. His son is someone already at Hogwarts. Maybe Snape and his
wife
> > are divored LOL. or He doesn't want anyone to know because
Voldemort
> > would know and off his family..so they are in hiding. Can you
say
> > witness protection program.
>
> Julie: Possible. Though to hide his son, you'd think Snape would
have
> him stowed away somewhere not so close, and not right in the middle
> of the likely chaos that is coming (given Harry Potter is destined
to be
> right in the middle of things and is at Hogwarts).
KarentheUnicorn's Reply: Maybe I should have made this one as two
theories, I was thinking maybe it is a child at hogwarts,and also at
the same time was thinking the kid might not be at hogwarts, and to
connect Theory #5 and add a new twist, maybe neither of them know
about each other..meh..well, if it was Severus Snape, instead of
Harry Potter books, I'd say it'd make a great story..anywayz.
>
>
> > 5. Ok, so what if he has a Son and he doesn't even know about
> > it..DOH.
>
> Julie: It doesn't seem likely, again because it doesn't really
feed
> the plot (at least not in any way I can think of, though that
doesn't
> mean JKR couldn't have thought of a way!).
KarentheUnicorn's Reply: Yea, I agree, but this is just fun theory
ideas that poped into my head....its a nice slow day....but hay it
gave me a good idea for my fanfic..so Here's to wild theories.
>
> > 6. Add your own theory here.
>
> Julie: I do like the theory that Snape's son might be the half-
> Blood prince. If Snape was involved with a muggle, that would
> be sufficient reason to hide the resulting offspring from Voldy.
> OTOH, we don't know if Snape is a fullblood, as JKR has
> not be clear about that. Maybe Snape has muggle blood in
> him and the pure-blood is the mother. As to why the boy
> would show up now, well, he would be 16-17 yrs old by now,
> assuming he was born at or before the point when Snape
> left Voldy. That's an age where it becomes a little hard to
> keep the reins tight, and when he might, in his mind and/or
> the minds of others, be at an age where he can now protect
> himself.
KarentheUnicorn's Reply: Yes, the only problem I keep running into
is, I would think Snape would surly have his son at Hogwarts as a
student, unless he is at another school for his protection. So it
would be somewhat strange to consider the kid just showing up. But
here is another idea. What if the child was born after the Voldy
downfall, what if, during the time of peace Snape had a bit
of..well...either fun...or just...well did something wreckless. We
obviously know he can be wreckless, I mean, why would he follow the
advice of Sirius if he was not a little wreckless, of course we have
to wait and see what idea JKR comes up with to explain this...but
going on that, maybe he just met a witch or muggle he liked durning
the time of peace...had a one night stand, never saw her again, and
then...suddenly here is a first year kid, looking exactly like a
little Snape, and well, you know---this doesn't sound like a kids
book anymore so--I digress...but it sure sounds like a good fanfic
idea.
>
> WHY Dumbledore trusts Snape:
> My biggest reason for liking the Snape's son theory, BTW,
> is that it provides the PERFECT reason why Dumbledore trusts
> Snape. If Dumbledore helped Snape hide the son from Voldy,
> and DD is the only other one who knows the boy's whereabouts,
> then he has every reason to be secure in Snape's loyalty. And
> it doesn't even matter if Snape just changed sides to protect
> his son, or if he changed his actual ideology after his son was
> born. DD can be certain of Snape's loyalty either way!
KarentheUnicorn's Reply:
Yes, I agree. Its hard to see what would make Snape change sides,
what would cause him to move his loyalty, since, he seems quite
loyal, for the most part, to Dumbledore. I know that some say he is
not, but, its hard to see why he would do some of the things he has
done in the book, if he was not loyal to Dumbledore. Though, their
are so many reasons given by others for this change. It just seems
to me a child would be a very good reason for that sort of loyalty.
KarentheUnicorn
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive