Voldy, Macbeth and the ambiguity of prophecy (spoilers)
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at aol.com
Tue May 17 22:59:03 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 129105
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "inkling108" <inkling108 at y...>
wrote:
Inkling:
> To me the most intriguing part of JKR's FAQ response was the part
that
> touched on the significance of prophecy in her literary world. To
wit:
>
> "If neither boy was 'pre-ordained' before Voldemort's attack to
become
> his possible vanquisher, then the prophecy (like the one the
witches
> make to Macbeth, if anyone has read the play of the same name)
becomes
> the catalyst for a situation that would never have occurred if it
had
> not been made...Destiny is a name often given in retrospect to
choices
> that had dramatic consequences"
>
> and
>
> "the prophecy...remains ambiguous, not only to readers, but to my
> characters. Prophecies (think of Nostradamus!) are usually open to
> many interpretations. That is both their strength and their
weakness."
>
> When I read this I realized I had to reexamine all my assumptions
> about the prophecy. I also ran to the bookshelf to pull out
Macbeth.
Geoff:
I don't know whether our thoughts touch base or not but I posted some
ramblings involving Macbeth quite recently (but before JKR's
references). The thread was "The prophecy - a maverick view" and
started at post 128332; it might add an item or so to the mix of
ingredients.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive