An alternate RAB theory.
Tim
tmarends at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 9 15:13:54 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 142716
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "truthbeauty1" <rh64643 at a...>
wrote:
>
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "apollo414j" <apollo414j at y...>
> wrote:
>
> > Apollo414j:
> > Definitely. I think it's important to note that Rowling writes a
> > great deal of her books based on ideas of misdirection and
guiding
> > people in the wrong direction.
>
> This is often true. However, the main reason that I believe R.A.B
to
> be Regulus, is that Hermione didnt think of it. If Hermione had come
> back from the library and listed Regulus as a possibility, I would
> probably not believe it. Hermione nor anyone else in the trio even
> thought of Regulus, which I think is odd unless JKR didn't want to
> give it away just yet. I also believe that the identity of R.A.B
will
> not be the big mystery. The big questions will be: is he indeed
dead,
> how well did he know L.V, how did he find out for sure about
horcruxes
> years before D.D, and did he indeed destroy the locket? I believe
> that, that is quite enough to be going on with.
Of course Regulus is dead. Kreatcher wouldn't have to obey Harry if
he wasn't.
Tim
>
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive