What would a successful AK mean?

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 142871

> Antosha:
<SNIP>
> It is good to remember that, like police officers who are 
authorized to use deadly force 
> under certain circumstances, the Aurors have been allowed to use 
Avada Kedavra. It clearly 
> isn't seen as a surefire soul-destroyer or a sign that one is 
absolutely Dark. It's just... 
> Unforgivable.


Alla:

I didn't interpret the narrative about this event as sympathetic or 
even undestanding the necessity durin the war. The person who allowed 
to use Unforgiuveables was Barty Sr., whose reign was not fair and 
just, no?

I was not feeling that narrator aproves what Barty did at all. I 
don't think that this is a solid support for Avada Kedavra even as 
necessity based.
Just my interpretation of course.

Alla