Why did we SEE the UV? (was re: The Possibilities of Grey Snape)
lupinlore
bob.oliver at cox.net
Mon Nov 14 15:32:51 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 143020
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Jen Reese" <stevejjen at e...>
wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> We get to see Snape doing something outside Harry's POV and the
> action appears to be untrustworthy. In my mind, the through-line
of
> the relationship got messed with a bit. Snape should not be seen
> actually *doing* something untrustworthy to maintain the simple
> trust storyline throughout.
>
That's a very good point, Jen. Why did JKR find it necessary for us
to SEE the UV? As you say, if this was a simple continuation of the
trust angle, there were other ways to do it that didn't violate
Harry's POV and that would have been much more in keeping with what
went on in the earlier books. When an author, or anyone else for
that matter, violates a well-established and successful practice,
they generally have a good reason. What was JKR's reason?
One answer is that this is all just a gigantic red herring. JKR
showed the UV so that the readers, as well as Harry, would be
suckered in against Snape and then be shocked by some sort of
reversal. That is the UV isn't really binding, or was set up by DD
in some unexplicable way for some unfathomable reason, or ....
whatever.
Frankly, I don't buy it, at least not completely. Yes, there have
been reversals before, but this time we have a scene that was set
off against HP tradition in a way that made it obvious the author
was saying "Look at this! It's important!" It wasn't something in
Harry's POV, or that we found out from an overheard conversation or
a found letter. It was something that we actually saw with no
excuse that anyone's POV was acting as a filter, and as Jen says
that is a very different kettle o' fish than Harry overhearing Snape
and Quirrel or the PS Quidditch match or .... It could be a red
herring, but that just doesn't seem right. That smacks of a games-
playing JKR who is sitting on the sidelines, rubbing her hands
gleefully and just waiting to jump up and down and say "Fooled you!
Nyah! Nyah!" That not only would be obnoxious, but it also strikes
me as not being much in keeping with the persona that comes across
in her public appearances. JKR in her appearances comes across as
someone who, yes, might show ambiguous and misleading scenes, but
who doesn't go wildly and extravagantly out of her way just to
sucker fans into dodging one way so she can left hook them with a
reversal. And going wildly and extravagantly out of her way to hit
readers with a reversal is exactly what the UV scene would be if it
is a complete red herring.
So, unless I've misread JKR and she is much more of a juvenile games
player than I imagine, there must be some significance to the UV
scene. It must be there because it serves a purpose that just
inserting it into the plot in the normal way, through Harry's POV,
would not accomplish. As Jen says, it tends to make fans question
the easy assumption that Harry is always wrong in mistrusting Snape,
and it makes any simple trust/faith through line extremely
problematic. Frankly, given all this evidence I wouldn't trust
Snape just because some elderly schoolmaster said so, even if I did,
under normal circumstances, have the greatest respect for said
elderly schoolmaster's wisdom. And if JKR's message in the end is
going to be ... well, don't trust yourself, you should trust someone
against all evidence just because someone else says so (the singsong
of every corrupt and profoundly oppresive social system in history),
I'd say she needs to profoundly rethink the basis of her philosophy.
Lupinlore
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive