The two versions of the Prophecy
Bonnie Harvey/ Alesia Gillefalyn
alesiaglfyn at juno.com
Fri Nov 18 02:22:54 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 143175
Carol wrote:
>I'm wondering whether anyone else views Trelawney's version of
>the Prophecy and Snape's role as eavesdropper as irreconcilable
>with Dumbledore's version. The problem is exacerbated, or perhaps
>caused, by Dumbledore's decision to show Trelawney giving the
>Prophecy without showing the complete memory. All we have is
>Memory!Trelawney standing up in the Pensieve and reciting the
>*uninterrupted* Prophecy, punctuated with ellipses in exactly the
>same way as her second prophecy in PoA (regarding the Dark Lord's
>servant) is punctuated, but with no indication of an interruption,
>and Dumbledores unsatisfactory explanation that the eavesdropper,
>whom we find out later is the young Severus Snape, heard only the
>first part of the Prophecy (the same part that he reported to
>Voldemort) and then was ejected from the building (presumably by
>Aberforth).
Alesia suggests:
I always took the version Trelawney gave Harry about how Snape
overheard the Prophecy as her way of making herself look more
important in Harry's eyes. Her way of legitimizing herself to
The Chosen One after being dismissed by the Greatest Wizard
of the Age. I dont think Trelawney knows when she makes real
predictions. She has never shown any indication she is even
aware she made a prophecy to Harry his third year about the return
of Voldemort. So she 'tells' Harry she knew about Snape but what
she doesn't say is that she knew Snape was being discovered when
it happened rather then after her prediction was complete.
Consider this timeline:
DD meets Trelawney in the Hogs Head. The interview begins.
During the course of the interview Trelawney slips into the
Prophecy. Halfway through the Prophecy Aberforth discovers Snape
outside the door. He removes Snape (but I doubt he lets him go -
remember we are still at War it is the Spring of 1979 or 1980).
By the time Aberforth returns from securing Snape for further
questioning, Trelawney has finished the Prophecy. Aberforth
tells DD what has happened and Trelawney is only then aware she
has made a Prophecy and the fact it was overheard.
Also consider at some point, maybe not at the time of the
interview but at some point, DD told Trelawney she was not safe
outside of Hogwarts. (When Umbridge tried to get rid of her,
Trelawney knew she couldn't leave.)
Carol wrote:
>Also, Trelawney tells Harry that Snape must have been
>eavesdropping to pick up interview techniques and that he was
>looking for a job at the time
Alesia suggests:
I also took Trelawneys assumption that Snape was getting
interview tips as JKRs sense of humor coming to the forefront.
She is further reinforcing our belief that Trelawney is a little
off and out of touch with the world.
Carol wrote:
>Trelawney's interview occurs nearly two years before this time,
>on a cold, rainy night several months before Harry is born
>(probably around April 1980 because DD refers to it as "sixteen
>years ago" as of June 1995, but an earlier date of December 1979
>or January 1980 would fit better with Trelawney's statement that
>she's been teaching "nearly sixteen years") to fill what seems
>to be an unanticipated vacancy. But not even Trelawney would
>expect a young man to be listening for interview tips in the
>middle of the school year, much less a year and a half to nearly
>two years before he actually applied.
Alesia suggests:
I think the Lexicon has this wrong about this one. They have
Trelawney giving the Prophecy in 1980. I think Trelawney made
the Prophecy in the Spring of 1979 and starts teaching the Fall
of the 1979-1980 school year. Which would mean Harrys fifth
year (1995 -1996 school year) is indeed her sixteenth year at
Hogwarts. Now, Snape gets caught listening to the Prophecy in
the Spring of 1979, presumably Voldemort has sent him to apply
for the yearly vacant DADA job. DD obviously doesnt give him
the job but does turn him into a spy at this time or soon there
after. Heck, it may be the true Slytherin (per Phineas
Nigellus Black) that Snape is; he offered to be a spy to keep
his bum out of Azkaban. (This is the main reason I think the
reason DD gave Harry for trusting Snape is incomplete because
the timeline doesnt seem to add up to me.)
Two years later, DD hires Snape in the summer of 1981 as the
potions master for the 1981-1982 school year (which is 14 yrs
before Harrys fifth year at Hogwarts). This may have been done
to help with Snapes job as a double agent. DD states in the DE
trials that Snape was a spy PRIOR to the defeat of Voldemort.
JKR has always said DD never lies. We all know he omits some
pieces of information. We know from DD Snape did indeed tell
Voldemort about the Prophecy but what if there is another part
to what makes him turn? What if there was an additional reason
we are not yet aware of? All DD says is that Snape was remorseful
at how Voldemort interrupted the Prophecy. As I think everyone
agrees we are still missing information about why DD trusted
Snape.
Alesia
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive