Harry's bias again, answering several posts
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Sat Oct 1 06:56:56 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 140997
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Ceridwen" <ceridwennight at h...>
wrote:
Alla:
> > Again, going back to the first scene, I find Lebeto's example to
be
> > perfect - Snape punishes Harry for the fact that he did not help
> > Neville. Erm... how exactly would it look differently if anybody
> else
> > would tell us "objective description " of this action?
> >
> > I mean, sure Draco and Co woul add different adverbs or
objectives
> to
> > it - " how great that Snape did punish that Potter or something
> like
> > that", but suppose we are asking "neutral" narrator to tell us
> about
> > this event. Do you think such narrator would be able to put
> positive
> > spin on Snape's actions here?
>
> Ceridwen:
> I don't know if an objective narrator could. I don't have anything
> else other than Harry's POV to go on. Given what we have, no, I
> doubt it. But, going back to the broom hexing, I can't allow
myself
> to be quite so sure about it. It *looks* like a duck, it *quacks*
> like a duck, but is it a duck?
Geoff:
I agree that we are seeing things from Harry's point of view but this
incident is not written in reported speech after it happened but as
a "real time" event so, if Snape's words are being accurately
recorded, then I believe there is no room for a positive spin.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive