Uses for imperius (was: Motivations for Joining DEs)
Ceridwen
ceridwennight at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 7 01:44:30 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 141248
Sherry:
> There could not be any good reason for it (Imperius), in my
opinion. After all, the
> only way an addict truly stops doing whatever their addiction is,
is when
> they make the choice to stop doing it.
*(snip)*
Ceridwen:
And, I disagree. I can't speak for anyone else, but when I said
Imperius could be used in mental health, I went on to mention
violence. Both against oneself, and against others. An addict in
recovery, or in need of recovery, would not fit that criteria. And
someone who was, in the opinion of some, being 'obstinate'
about 'what was good for them' (and I'll bet that quite a few of us
have been described that way, with the describers then trying to run
our lives, I know I have) would not fit that criteria, either. Use
against people who are mentally able, even if in the opinion of some
layperson whose advice was rejected are in a diminished state, is,
would be, wrong.
There are people who cannot control their actions. They cannot make
decisions. They lash out, or turn on themselves, and do grave harm.
I'm not talking about the 'cutting' that goes on in a lot of
fanfics. I'm sorry, but that just reads like teenage hyperangst
dreamed up by some grousey teen who wants to hurt people because
they're aching over some hormonally induced fury. I'm talking about
people who beat their caregivers and are incapable of stopping this
sort of behavior, and people who harm themselves and cannot control
their own actions in order to stop. Severely, and truly, mentally
impared.
We use, or have used, straight jackets and padded cells to control
these people. For everybody's good, including their own. It can't
be comfortable. Imperius, stopping them from harming themselves and
the people trying to help them, would be kinder, IMO. It isn't
removing the will, since the behaviors are not done by will but by
compulsion. It wouldn't address the root causes of the behaviors,
but it would make it safer for the people who can do this, to come in
and help.
And, since it did come up before, I do think the MoM would sanction
using Imperius. It sanctioned Unforgivables before, under Crouch,
sr. And the WW at large seems to be fairly apathetic toward what
doesn't directly affect them. If the DMLE is using Unforgivables on
DEs, so what? 'They deserve it'. And a fairly convincing politician
can make it sound like they're staunchly doing their duty.
Which doesn't mean that, in rare cases, Imperius to temporarily
detain a violent criminal *when s/he's violent* and caught in the act
of a crime, might be handy for the cop on the scene. Either to leave
the criminal in order to pursue other criminals, or to keep himself
or herself safe until back-up arrives. But again, I'm talking about
an obviously violent individual here, not Standard Operating
Procedure for law enforcement.
Ceridwen.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive