A Cold Equation (was Re: The Trial Of Severus Snape)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 10 02:47:23 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 141367
> zgirnius:
> Noone is denying that is a possibility. What they are suggesting
is
> that Fenrir and the other three Death Eaters would not have waited
> around for someone to bring an antidote. Dumbledore was
*defenseless*
> for the moment because of the potion, so the four DEs could have
> finished him.
".
Alla:
Well, yes, but not simply because Snape was there, but because he
came there and he could have given DD the antidote fast, thus making
DD stronger, then indeed fight with DE or something.
But while I of course read the other posts in the thread, I was
specifically addressing Houyhnmmm's point, who ( the way I
interpreted it and I am sorry if I interepreted it incorrectly that
she was not suggesting that DD was dying either from ring curse or
cave potion, but the situation on the Tower was fatal nevertheless
because Dumbledore was helpless ( weakened from the Potion,etc.)
And I am saying that if DD was helpless from potion but could
recover from it, it increases Snape liability very significantly to
me, because it would mean that " but for Snape actions" Dumbledore
could have survived the Tower.
Zgirnius:
<SNIP>
>
> Now, I'm going to guess your next objection..."But Snape was
there,
> he could protect Dumbledore
But I think it is a
> reasonable supposition that the moment he raises his wand in DD's
> defense, he dies. That is an unambiguous indication he is not
going
> to keep his Vow.
Alla:
Well, yes, of course it is a reasonable supposition, but again since
we don't know the details of how UV magic works, except of course
than you die if you break it, I think it also a reasonable
assumption to make that if Snape does not flat out refuse to finish
Draco's task, he may still live.
The way I see it, Snape DID have options on the Tower. He could have
use his Patronus for example and send emergency message to other
Order members who were close enough. In the meanwhile, Snape may
have stall for time or again start fighting , maybe somehow trying
to fool the Vow, even if temporarily. Of course, in this scenario
Snape eventually dies, since sooner or later the magic which
underlines UV WILL recognise that Snape is not going to finish
Draco's task, but I don't think that we know for sure that Snape did
not have stalling options.
Zgirnius:
> I would agree that Snape has some responsibility for the
situation,
> especially if he knew what Draco's task was when he took the Vow.
Alla:
I know you do. :-) It is very enjoyable debating with you, because
even though we do have some major differences when we evaluate
Snape , we also have some major overlapping points in our views, so
I can easily figure out where and why we start to differ.
Zgirnius:
(I
> would also submit the possibility that *Snape* agrees with you. He
> certainly does not seem to me to be particularly pleased with the
way
> events turn out in the end of the book...)
Alla:
LOL! I sure hope so that this was beginning of major "inner turmoil"
for Snape.
Zgirnius:
But while he is at least
> partially responsible, it is not clear to me that a different
course
> of action at that point would have produced any better results.
>
Alla:
I can definitely see both possibilities.
JMO,
Alla.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive