Academic dishonesty (was "Apologies and responsibility")
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 3 16:40:21 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 139437
"Matt" wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree with that conclusion, but let's bring the
example
> in line with the situation in HBP: Not an older sibling's book, but
a
> secondhand book with scribbles in the margin. I used many
secondhand
> books in my day, and it never would have occurred to me to cite the
> unknown author if my reading of the text had been colored by the
> marginal notes --
>Do the "talented" potionmakers in
> the class actually understand what they are doing, or are they
simply
> following instructions? Does Harry -- presented with the contrast
> between the textbook instructions and Snape's -- understand things
any
> better than the rest of the class, or is he, too, simply following
> instructions?
Finwitch:
You know -- as Harry's not a book-learner, nor one who strives to
understand theory. He's one who learns best in pracical view, by
intuition etc. as well as extremely lucky where it counts... he
appreciates and values Hermione for knowledge, cleverness and
understanding of their subjects, but theory is not for Harry.
You know, particularly now that they ARE learning how to do magic
without incantation at all - remembering Hermione instructing Ron how
to properly pronounce the Wingardium Leviosa they had to be doing...
I don't think the incantation *really* mattered. It's just that -
putting high emphasis to the incantation said in exactly the correct
accent, waving a wand in exactly correct method during the early
years of learning - prevents the early failure from destroying belief
and confidence, both of which are more or less vital for the
controlled magic they're teaching - or correct set of mind.
The magical mind needs to be taught subtly - very subtly. In both
Neville and Merope we've seen what *confidence* means for
spellcasting, by showing the lack of it applied to spells. We've seen
how Ron, despite of failing to levitate a feather in class, succeed
in levitating a Troll's Club with that same spell. Why? Because when
that Troll's about to kill him, he's definately NOT thinking whether
or not he can do it, only about DOING it. And of course, after he's
done that, he KNOWS he can.
Just like Harry's Patronus. He could cast it, with the timeturner
helping him to realize that he really CAN do it, right here and now...
As for Harry's potions - well, I think his intuition - possibly what
he had learned from Tom Riddle/his parents earlier, when very young
but suppressed due to Dursleys - that in a way, Harry's only
remembering what he's always known. In addition, I'd say that Harry
looking at the notes merely allows him an excuse to access knowledge
within that he's had for quite some time. If, for instance, he had
remembered his mother brewing that potion -- he'd still have another
recipe, another knowledge...
Finwitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive