Academic dishonesty.

[eggplant107]

No: HPFGUIDX 139570

<lady.indigo at g...> wrote:

> The Harry apologists are sounding
> suspiciously like the Snape apologists 

Yes, the only difference is that Harry didn't report there was
graphite in his book and Snape murdered Dumbledore.

> The recipies in the book 
> are tried and proven 

Proven not to work apparently. 

> just what is the appropriate ratio
> of personal trauma to completely
> unrelated moral error, exactly?

9.47819

> Can we please call a spade a spade here?
> Harry did a bad thing and never regretted it

If I thought Harry did a bad thing I would not hesitate for one
millisecond to say so, but if I had done what Harry did and if I lived
to be 99 I would not regret it. 

> incorrect instructions which made
> the potion blow up, or have some
> opposite effect, that's what I 
> would consider lousy instructions.
> And in that case it wouldn't be 
> in an approved textbook.

Please understand I mean no insult, you're a Harry Potter fan just
like me so you must be a good person, but I must say the above sounds
just a little like something Umbridge would say.

Eggplant