Sirius' declaration of loyalty in the Shrieking Shack
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 7 13:24:04 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 139730
Saraquel:
-snipping excellent post--
> If the crunch came, and there was any doubt, I think Sirius is the
> sort of person who would prefer to die mistaken in thinking loyalty
> was intact, than to risk, being in any way responsible for the death
> of someone who might turn out to have been innocent.
Finwitch:
I find that very well said. I also believe that Dumbledore felt the
same way and very much so. I mean, in particular, about Severus Snape.
The possibility that Severus Snape was sincere in his repentance and
defiance of Voldemort - how ever small - was enough.
Just like Regulus - Sirius despises his ever joining Death Eaters, but
he has *no* doubt whatsoever that he truly left them. And Dumbledore
never had doubts about Snape leaving Death Eaters.
I certainly refuse to believe that it was foolish of Dumbledore to
accept this repentant, even if there was no proof but Snape's word,
even if Snape lied about it. Yes, it was a risk - but trust is *always*
a risk. You can never know for sure. Dumbledore died for his trust in
Snape, but even so, I think *he* had the better part than Moody the
Paranoid.
Finwitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive