DWG – TR; LV – RAB; LV - DM

[Hagrid]

No: HPFGUIDX 139974

Dark Wizard Grindelwald and Tom Riddle; Lord Voldemort and Regulus 
Black; Lord Voldemort and Draco Malfoy =(DWG – TR // LV – RAB // LV -
 DM) 
(follows on from an earlier discussion- Re: Grindelwald taught Tom 
about making Horcruxes)

-aussie-
I proposed that Grindlewald (can I call him DWG for Dark Wizard 
Grindlewald from now on?) , so DWG taught TR (Tom Riddle) of Horcrux 
making in 1942-45 because it could show a pattern. Not only with a 
second reason why  Dark Wizard LV would insist Draco Malfoy AKs DD 
(thus tearing his soul), but also why RAB would know about LV's 
Horcrux. What turned Regulus away from LV? He may have refused to 
follow a kill order. 

There was a distinct reason why DWG would have wanted, even 
encouraged, young Tom to split his soul by murdering his muggle 
father.

It is the same reason, IMO why LV wanted to get Draco to commit the 
murder of DD, and all the DEs knew no-one else was to AK DD. 

LV may have been given RAB a different target. Just as LV killed his 
family member, RAB's refused to kill Sirius, his brother.

JKR interview July 16 2005: "That doesn't necessarily show that 
Voldemort killed him, personally, but Sirius himself suspected that 
Regulus got in a little too deep. Like Draco. He was attracted to 
it, but the reality of what it meant was way too much to handle."

So JKR mentioned Regulus and Draco to fuel this theory. But it still 
doesn't explain how RAB knew of that hidden Horcrux.  

Consider the legacy of a Dark Wizard to a young and willing 
apprentice. We have already seen how others bodies may be taken over 
(as with Quirrel and the diary's attempt on Ginny.)

By getting a Hogwarts student, an under aged wizard, to tear his 
sole in a murder, that could be ... could be ... ok, help me out 
here guys - Why would a Dark Wizard need young blood to spill blood?

LV needed blood to come back in the graveyard scene.

Is ther a patern with Tom, Regulus and Draco?
-aussie-