It is all about Snape WAS: Re: Hearing from the Great Middle
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 13 18:07:59 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 140111
Lupinlore:
> <snip>
> >
> > Having said that, I do believe that, from the standpoint of plot
> and literary merit, it makes a lot more sense for Snape not to be
> completely on any side but his own.
>
> Pippin:
> Um, I don't think I follow. Are you suggesting that if Snape
murdered
> Dumbledore for purely selfish reasons, rather than to assist Lord
> Voldemort, he wouldn't be evil? ::boggles:::
>
Alla:
I don't want to speak for Lupinlore of course, but to me the
situation
in which Snape would be out for himself is when he murdered
Dumbledore
not because he intended to follow through with the task which
Voldemort
said, but because SNAPE felt that he had no other choice.
Please take into consideration that I am not saying that NARRATOR
(and
I mean JKR here) will agree with Snape that he had no other choice, I
am just saying that Snape may felt that killing Dumbledore was
justified, because that would allow Snape to live.
Actually, come to think of it Snape may have felt that he would
indeed
help good guys by killing Dumbledore and staying alive.
Hmmm, I think I am describing Snape from Siguine's essay again, but
she
was more talking about good Snape. Sigh...
I guess I have to backtrack and hope that Lupinlore would be able to
explain better, I am just saying that Snape who killed primarily
because he wanted to stay alive, in my mind, had better chance to be
redeemed than the one who killed specifically because he was
fulfilling
what Voldemort ordered.
I managed to confuse myself, I think.
JMO,
Alla.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive