Hagrid in GH (and Harry at PD)

[jmoses22002]

No: HPFGUIDX 140656

<gbannister10 at t...> wrote:
snip
> The second point - about Harry - arises from the fact that Harry was 
> 15 months old when Godric's Hollow was attacked. He was not a baby, 
> but most likely a toddler. The great majority of children are able to 
> get around by this age. On the way, he was awake until they reached 
> Bristol but possibly quiet and Hagrid did have him in his arms but 
> what about when Dumbledore placed him on the doorstep? I have doubts 
> whether a toddler of 15 months placed in this situation would 
> normally remain tucked up and asleep for several hours which 
> apparently was the case with Harry.
> 
> Did Dumbledore cast some sort of sleeping spell on him to prevent him 
> crawling off to explore the garden?

jmoses now:
  I don't think Dumbledore put a spell on him.  Just think about it. 
 Harry fended off a powerfull curse.  Maybe he was it tired him out. 
JMHO.  
-
  Dumbledore could have put the spell on him for his own protection
though of course.