[HPforGrownups] Re: Dumbledore's gleam shared blood

[catherine higgins]

No: HPFGUIDX 150905

  
bboyminn:

But is that true Catherine? We know Dumbledore's protection at the
Dursley's ends when Harry turns 17. But Dumbledore based that
protection on the 'blood' protection Harry already had(...) from Lily's sacrifice.
   
  Catherine again:
   
  You know, I've never thought about it that way. It would be an interesting twist if Harry is actually safets in Voldemort's presence. 
   
  I think Voldemort's undoing will be his own arrogance. I would bet in a way that it would be easier for, say, Bella to kill Harry as opposed to Voldemort. Yet he would never allow anyone but himself to kill Harry.
   
  Another theory I have is that the final confrontation between Harry and Voldemort will have 100's of dementors as well. Harry will be able (eventually, after several heart-stopping failures) to produce a patronus. Voldemort, having absolutely no happy memories to draw from will be unable to produce a sufficiently strong patronus and he will have his soul sucked out. It's the only thing in canon that is repeatedly thought of as "worse than death", fitting for a man so bent on being immortal, to finish his life, an empty soul-less shell? 
   
  My other most fitting idea on how to vanquish Voldemort would be if there was a way that could rob him of his powers and have him become a Mere Mortal Muggle MMM!Voldemort. How much would that suck for him!!!  Brings a smail to my face just thinking of it :-)
   
  Catherine
  (who really doesn't think being a muggle is a fate worse than death, but perhaps Voldemort would. And who is also proud of thinking of MMM!Voldemort. I like alliteration!)

		
---------------------------------
Share your photos with the people who matter at Yahoo! Canada Photos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]