[HPforGrownups] Re: Dumbledore's Death
OctobersChild48 at aol.com
OctobersChild48 at aol.com
Fri Apr 14 21:28:21 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 150952
In a message dated 4/12/06 10:47:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
celizwh at intergate.com writes:
> If Dumbledore *is* still alive at the beginning of book 7, I think we
> will see his real death by the end of the book, but it will be a death
> that Harry, the WW, and we the readers can accept as suitable for the
> greatest wizard of his time.
In my ineloquent, bumbling way I would like to respond to this. I consider
the statement "and we the readers can accept" to be profound. I can accept the
fact that Dumbledore is dead, and have never had any doubt that he is. What I
cannot accept is the way he died. I feel that Jo really let us down with this
one. I have to be honest and say that I never really gave much thought to the
possibility that DD would die. I expected him to be right beside Harry for the
final confrontation with Voldemort. I don't usually read this genre of book,
so I was unaware that the mentor is supposed to die so the hero can go it
alone. I did give some thought to the fact that DD could die, going out in a blaze
of glory during the final confrontation, as would befit the greatest wizard of
his time. But to be murdered while weak and feeble, by someone he trusted,
just doesn't cut it. Whether he was killed by ESE!Snape, or DDM!Snape, he was
murdered nonetheless. I, personally, feel cheated. Dumbledore's funeral did him
justice, but his death did not. And the pleading, no matter what he was
pleading for, just made it worse. I'm sure there are those who are going to jump in
and say that he died nobly for the cause, which I won't argue, but I still
think Jo could have done better for the greatest wizard of his time.
Sandy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive