Problem with Sirius(was:re:Dumbledore on the Dursleys in OotP )
castle_bird_blue
jedynka0 at op.pl
Fri Apr 21 16:31:37 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 151266
>richter_kuymal wrote:
> PAR: this rather implies Puppetmaster!DD. Surely a father figure
> who can provide HP with comfort and concern (GoF) and who goes to
> the extreme of living as a dog eating rats in order to "be there"
> is something that HP could emulate as a GOOD thing.
>
<snip>
> Actually, I find him rather restrained in many situations.
<snipped examples of Sirius' restrainted behavior with Kreature>
> Yes, he hates Snape. Tolerates the man insulting him in his own
> house though, for the sake of the OOP.
<snip>
> Has enough courage, bravery and yes, LOVE to take risks for Harry.
> That is bad? Impulsive? Not really. He didn't obey DD. That isn't > impulsive, that is disagreeing with DD's orders. He went to the
> MOM to rescue Harry -- ok, he might not have gotten killed if he
> hadn't gone, but he was a useful member of that rescue party and
> without a rescue party Harry and the others would likely have died > or been crucio'd to insanity. He jibes at Bella. There, I'll
> grant you, it isn't the smartest thing to do when you are in a
> fight. Very traditional for the old "knight in armor" Arthurian
> types though.
>
<snip>
blue:
From his first appearance in book 3, Sirius Black was all about
emotions and acting on impulses. This is rather hard to deny seing
that in almost his every single scene he is raging, bitching,
storming, throwing tantrums or running around jumping or singing
parodies of Christmas Carolls (And yes I'm aware of the "Padfoot'
return" chapter in GoF but I also recall that he came back to
England without thinking and caring about what it could mean for his
safety, recklessly sneaking around and chirping about eating
trashes). In the scene with Molly, he was described as acting or
speaking aggresively and if it had not been for Lupin he would have
probably hit or hex Molly after her infamous Azkaban' comment. That
doesnt sound rationally for me.
And there is nothing wrong with being emotional or fiery about
things. On the contrary- I prefer that kind of attitude rather than
passivity. How many people fell in love with McGonagall in OOTP
because of her "new found" raw emotions and fierce attitude toward
Umbridge?
The problem with Sirius was that his "fierceness" and emotions were
directed on the wrong people or subjects: miserable House Elf, his
crazy miserable mother, Snape whom he used to make miserable at
school, Dumbledore and Molly Weasley and the last three people know
far better than him what responsibility, maturity and duties means.
That's why Sirius comes out rather as a bratty than strong and
admirable. That's why IMO Dumbledore could see him as a treat for
Harry and his journey.
blue
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive