[HPforGrownups] Re: Is Harry a Murderer / Killer!! ?? !! Yeah or Nah??
Joe Goodwin
joegoodwin1067 at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 24 12:27:05 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 151366
>LaurelLei
>>And what about Draco in the bathroom and the sectasempra spell...? The
spell for enemies... the spell that Snape "reversed"... had Snape not
arrived and known what to do (because he was the "Prince" and possible
author)...???? Would Harry then have become a murderer if Draco had
died? Isn't what he did attempted murder?<snip>
Nikkalmati:
Now we come to the real leap into darkness for Harry. He already at the
opening feast wished for another death this year (meaning the new DADA teacher,
Snape). I found that shocking in Harry and a sign of his slide downhill. At
the end of the book, he commits an act that could be charged as first degree
murder. I don't see this act as self-defense, but escalation.
Joe:Escalation? Draco attempted to use an Unforgivable on Harry. How do you escalate from one of the three curses deemed Unforgivable?
Nikkalmati: (by the way
why didn't Harry say something like "what's the matter? or can I help you?
when he saw Draco in distress). Draco attacked first, but only with regular
hexes. Harry responded in kind. Draco tried Crucio and Harry hit him with
sectasempra. Now we know that the effect of a spell in PV depends on the intent
and strength of will behind it. Harry split Draco open and nearly killed
him. He probably in a Muggle court would be allowed to plead to involuntary
manslaughter, but the initial charge would be murder, if Draco died, and it was
only by good luck that he did not and probably Snape too because of the UV.
Joe: Sorry but once Draco used Crucio he in effect drew a deadly weapon. No court in the land would convict someone of defending themselves from something like what Draco tried, none.
LaurelLei:
>>but I found it very difficult to
explain to my sons that if he were to harm another like Harry did to
Draco or the others that they wouldn't "just get detentions".
Nikkalmati:I certainly agree there is a problem here. Harry shows some immediate
remorse, but it doesn't last long. Does he ever go to see Draco in the infirmary?
Does he even ask how he is doing? Just a touch of concern could have made
a difference to Draco or show real remorse. Instead he is soon complaining
about what appears to be a very mild detention for what he did. Does it
really matter that he misses Quiddich when Draco could have died? Has Snape given
up on anyone giving Harry any proper punishment? Did he even report Harry
to Minerva or DD? Does he know events are too near the climax to suspend or
expel Harry? I don't believe SS is afraid of DD finding out about the book or
the spell he created. Surely, DD knows a lot worse things about SS by now
and SS can't be held liable for losing a book. The detention SS does give has
the potentially beneficial effect of showing Harry "you don't want to be like
this; you can't afford to be like this; the WW can't afford for you to be
this childish; grow up Harry." Of course, he could just be showing Harry why
he disliked James and Sirius so much too <g>. JMO
Joe: Harry shows far more remorse for Draco than is even warranted. As you mentioned Harry sees an enemy in distress so he asks if he is 'okay'. Draco tries to hex Harry and they trade "normal' hexes until Drace escalating the conflict again tries to use a Unforgivable.
So Draco shoots first, then escalates then level of curses to the Unforgivable level and you think HARRY should be the one to feel remorse? If Draco had died he would have only had him self to blame. HE started the fight, he escalated the fight, period.
Come on now, the reason Snape doesn't make a big deal of it is pretty clear. He knows Harry and he knows Draco after five years and some change. He is pretty clear who is at fault when he sees what happened which is why he doesn't make problems for Harry. If he had and it had been looked into Draco would be on the way to join dad and people would be talking about how "The Boy who Lived" beat another "evil Unforgivable" using Slytherin. He might also have been a bit scared because if Harry had killed Draco then the Unbreakable vow might have some back to bite him.
Now I would like to mention that if Harry had killed Draco DD would still be alive and Bill Weasley wouldn't be scared for life.
Joe
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Before posting to any list, you MUST read the group's Admin File!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/files/Admin_Files/HBF_Text__MUST_READ
Please use accurate subject headings and snip unnecessary material from posts to which you're replying!
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "HPforGrownups" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
HPforGrownups-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Celebrate Earth Day everyday! Discover 10 things you can do to help slow climate change. Yahoo! Earth Day
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive