House Elf Loyalty
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 29 16:44:52 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 151645
> Magpie:
> Oh! Yes, we don't know how the thing started, and so we can't say
whether
> they're not under some enchantment. I think where the problem
comes in,
> though, is that it begs the question of why a House Elf's words
mean less
> than a wizard's. That is, if the elves very vocally want things
one way,
> and wizards decide that they don't know what's good for
themselves, how is
> that giving them their freedom? We see House Elves acting freely
a lot in
> canon, just around the rules of their own culture. So it's hard
to know
> where to draw the line between where the culture ends and their
true
> feelings begin.
Alla:
I think though those whether House Elves are enslaved or not and
whether what Hermione does is right or not are two connected but
separate issues. IMO there is no question that while JKR approves
Hermione's goals wholeheartedly, her means to achieve her goal are
very questionable.
What I am trying to say that IMO Hermione will get it in book 7 that
freeing House Elves against their will is very wrong and she will
find some other ways to show them that freedom is a good thing, not
an easy thing by all means, but good thing.
Magpie:
> It's true we don't know if all elves would react to freedom as
badly as
> Winky does--Hermione unfortunately does not seem able to even
really
> acknowledge this as a problem. She can't really help Winky
because she's
> projecting her own views on the situation and just can't get into
Winky's
> mindset.
Alla:
I completely agree with you as I said above. Hermione's ways of
dealing with the situation are wrong. What I do disagree with (again
not with you, just in general) is that we will learn that Hermione
was no supposed to react to situation at all.
IMO it is classical "her heart is the right place"; she is just
doing it incorrectly.
Magpie:
<SNIP>
> This is also what makes Dobby so problematic to me, because he's
such a
> caricature of Wizard Worship. Even to the point of the problem I
keep
> coming back to, which is that when the House Elves essentially go
on strike
> by not cleaning Gryffindor Tower to protest Hermione's insult, he
does it
> himself and takes away all the hats, flattering Hermione and
silencing the
> House Elves. He's just such a weird character for me because he
seems
> frankly more subservient to Wizards than the other House Elves,
while at the
> same time less because he's not a slave.
Alla:
I cannot grasp fully why Dobby does not work for me. Maybe that is
because I found his ways to save Harry in CoS to be so very idiotic
and harmful to Harry.
As to the worship, well, he does not worship all wizards, no? He
worships Harry just as the whole WW does, so I suppose Dobby can be
read as caricature of that.
Although I guess Dobby is quite ecstatic to work for DD so one can
argue that he worships Dumbledore too.
Magpie:
If all House Elves were like Dobby I
> can easily imagine a new found freedom lasting only a couple of
generations
> before it started to become slavery again--which could be the
point, for all
> I know. Maybe that's the way they became enslaved!
Alla:
Hehe. You could be right of course. As I said I find three elves,
who have more or less developed characters so far to be annoying,
all for different reasons, although since I buy the metaphor of
slavery, I feel for them as a group, but if we meet some other elves
and they would be just as annoying, I may stop feeling for them as a
group too.
You know, I think centaurs are incredibly cool and can totally
understand their prejudice to humans. I feel for them on the
emotional level and want them and humans to be at least friendly at
the end.
That may have something to do with me loving Greek mythology all my
life (I am quite well versed in it), so when I saw centaurs in
Potterverse, I was liking them already.
I like Goblins a lot and want to know more about their culture too (
Hmmm, can JKR write some more books about these two races, I
wonder? :-))
But as I said, for some reason I don't "feel" for House Elves much,
except because I am supposed to feel that slavery as bad ( funny -
exactly what JKR said - that we are supposed to feel that, but of
course many people don't like to feel what they are supposed to and
on some issues me neither).
It is probably because I don't feel much for the individual House
Elves we met. I guess Winky is the only one for whom I feel pity,
but again that is just pity, nothing more.
Dobby is... As I said I am not sure who he is and Kreacher is a
traitor, who betrayed one of my very favorite characters. Nope,
don't sympathize much with either of them.
> Alla:
> my main thing is that I don't remember any proof in canon
> that House Elfs willingly entered their service to humans. That is
> why I am hesitant to agree that they really like such service.
>
> Kemper now:
> Hi Alla. You're right there is no canon. BUT
there is canon
that a
> wandless HE can kick a wanded wizard's ass. So
why would an HE
enter
> into a contract of any kind with a magical human? The only reason
I
> can think is that their life purpose/mission is to serve, and some
> magical human took advantage while no other magical human
questioned
> the ethics of it, making it ok for other magical humans to do the
> same. And wah-la
time passes and there's a culture of indentured
> servitude.
>
Alla:
Hey, Kemper :).
Yep, House Elf can kick wizard's butt and isn't it very telling that
the moment Dobby is free he DOES kick wizard's butt , but not prior
to him being free?
So, isn't it possible that this is what may happen with many house
elves after they become free, namely that they will kick the butts
of their former masters when they are fully able to?
I can come up with some other reasons of why first HE would enter
into agreement with humans. Like for example they were blackmailed
into such agreement? Wizards took something from them and would not
return unless elves would agree to serve them?
I mean this is of course a wild speculation, but I am just saying
that this is not a given that House Elves would enter into such
agreement because they like it.
They may or they may not, we just don't know it yet IMO and here is
where I choose to go with JKR's words.
JMO,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive