Re: This shall be Salman Rushdie´s words (Spoiler????)!?

[Geoff Bannister]

No: HPFGUIDX 156541

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "houyhnhnm102" <celizwh at ...> wrote:
>
> wynnleaf:

> >To consider that to be true is to fall 
> > for a very common fallacy, the Latin name of which I 
> > can't recall at the moment, but the basic construction 
> > is: If A then B, does NOT mean the same as If B then A.
 
> houyhnhnm:
> 
> I don't know the Latin name either. "Converting a conditional" 
> is what it is called in English.

Geoff:
I think you are referring  to a non-sequitur? (= "it does not follow")