Irma Pince magical? (WAS:Theory on Petunia)
abergoat
adescour at pirl.lpl.arizona.edu
Sat Aug 5 00:33:58 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 156554
Abergoat says:
Thanks to both Mike and bridge13219 for the quotes that prove Irma is
magical.
Mike wrote:
> As far as those celluloid abominations, look at all of the
> charactors left out of the earlier films that we *know* were
> important in later books.
But that is the point, why did they put her IN the films? She has had
zero importance (thus far). Very odd.
Mike wrote:
> And she values her books over anything or
> anyone (unless she *is* secretly in love with Filch).
Abergoat says:
I think that both Irma and Filch are related to Snape and that is
their importance. People on the Eileen Prince thread roll their eyes
when I say it but I strongly suspect that Snape lost his parents early
because Eileen had the Ravenclaw relic and I believe Irma and Filch
'filched' the relic back, now a horcrux. And they are hiding it as a
family heirloom, completely oblivious to its significance to the
defeat of Voldemort. If so they will both become very significant in
book seven.
There is no reason to believe someone can tell something is a horcrux
by just looking at it or even touching it. Since most fans believe
Harry has touched the locket horcrux in OoP that lends some support
that you cannot tell. Of course the locket could have been 'handled'
already. But Dumbledore didn't seem to be concerned about picking up
the locket once they had gotten past the defenses...but there again he
wasn't in top form at the time.
Abergoat
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive